Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

1961 Ruapehu crash findings questioned

Auckland solicitor, Russell Bartlett, son of Captain Alfred Bartlett who was killed on 21 November 1961 when his Bay of Plenty Airline Aero Commander crashed into Mount Ruapehu, believes the trouble over the accident should never have started. In an interview printed in the Sunday News, Mr Bartlett said the problems began when air accident inspectors did not accept eye witness accounts. "My family thinks the truth came out 23 years ago when eye witnesses said at inquests that they saw the plane disintegrate in midair." National Park businessman, Roy Turner, who went missing in the Southern Alps last year, told the inspectors at the time that he saw the plane flying about 3000 metres when there was an explosion, a wing flew off and the aircraft plunged into.

the snow on the Pinnacle Ridge next to the Whakapapa Skifield. But the 1 962 air inspector's report said the plane crashed because it was flying too low and hit the mountain. "It's always been a mystery to us that eye witnesses did not form part of the first report," Mr Bartlett said. "Roy Turner was an experienced mountain person and a pilot but for some reason he wasn't taken any notice of. Perhaps it was easier to blame the pilot." Mr Bartlett added that the trouble really began when his family were not shown a copy of the report prior to its public release. "If the proper procedure had been followed, the family might have had time to get submissions prepared and the whole thing might have been avoided," he said.

Professor Les Erasmus, head of Canterbury University's mechanical engineering department, was brought in by the Bartlett family in 1970 to further investigate on their behalf. He disputed claims made in the original report and was successful in getting the report rewritten in 1972. When the report was rereleased this year, it conceded several points. A leading expert on metal fatigue said no matter who flew the plane, it would have crashed because of a crack in its wing. In addition to Captain Bartlett, there were five passengers who perished in the accident. Neither Mr Bartlett nor Professor Erasmus are satsifed that Captain Bartlett 's name has been cleared as the Air Accidents Department has still not withdrawn its original report.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAIBUL19840925.2.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Waimarino Bulletin, Volume 2, Issue 17, 25 September 1984, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
386

1961 Ruapehu crash findings questioned Waimarino Bulletin, Volume 2, Issue 17, 25 September 1984, Page 3

1961 Ruapehu crash findings questioned Waimarino Bulletin, Volume 2, Issue 17, 25 September 1984, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert