Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN IMPORTANT AWARD.

FORTY-FOUR-HOUR WEEK IN AUSTRALIA. FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS. MELBOURNE, February 24. The majority judgment of the Federal Arbitration Court awarding a 44-hour week in the engineering industry is highly important, as to some extent it determines the standard hours of labour in Australian industries. Chief Justice Dethridge, in delivering judgment, said that the State laws had purported to make a shorter week general amongst most workers in New South Wales and Queensland and State arbitratal awards had a similar effect in Western Australia. It existed very largely in New Zealand, and had received support by men not themselves members of the wage-earning classes. The conclusion could not be evaded that a continuance of a 48-hour week was likely to be accompanied by an increased slackening and reduction of output among certain classes of workers which would largely offset the output derived from the extra four hours Of work per week. The Court was not influenced by political considerations, but could not ignore economic conditions merely because they were created partly or wholly by political or Governmental action, even though that action might be considered by sonic people to have been ill-advised or too far-reaching.

In any case, the Court could not prevent any person or body, or any State Government or Legislature, from coptinning to grant a 44-hour week to its own employees. Therefore, the Court ordered that a 44-hour week be granted in the engineering industry. The Judge added: “It must be taken as a guiding line that the judgment indicates the probable course of the Court in future applications.”— (P.AJ

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19270225.2.37

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, 25 February 1927, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
265

AN IMPORTANT AWARD. Wairarapa Age, 25 February 1927, Page 5

AN IMPORTANT AWARD. Wairarapa Age, 25 February 1927, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert