Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PANAMA CANAL BILL

AMERICAN EXEMPTION ESSENTIAL. (Received this morning, 12.20 o'clock.) WASHINGTON, September Q. According to data prepared by Mr Johnson, special commissioner at Panama, the whole of American coastwise traffic is likely to pass through -the Canal, when it opens, a million tons, I and during the following five years the estimates that this will increase to a million and a half tons. Mr Johnson is inclined to the belief that British and other foreign commerce will be obliged to bear the 10 per cent additional burden, over the amount payable, If the Americans are not exempted he points out that a proportional share of this burden will be born by American ships, which will consequently then bo on a precise equality with foreigners. He suggests a four shillings rate for ; the first year the Canal is in operation fin order to compete with the Suez Canal.

Oil a basis of ton million tons .' f business the yearly income would be entirely inadequate to meet 1 the charges of interest, sinking hind, and the sanitation of the canal. Consequently the Canal would be operated by the United States at heavy loss. He claims that the services granted to foreign *hips on a basis of a four shippings flat rate, is quite below the cost of services afforded. Consequently no discrimination should bo imposed on foreign vessels.

ARBITRATION IMPOSSIBLE. A DIPLOMAT'S VIEWS. (Received this morning, 12.20 o ? clock.) • LONDON, September 6. Mr Chauncery Depew, the ivellkhotr U.S.A. diplomat, in an interview, stated that he did not think the Panama Canal Bill would bo amended, or that arbitration would be adopted. America, ho said, would certainly be beaten if arbitration were adopted. .ti. -?" • •.>■>■: ■'■ .-i-i ■ &■:■ r . . ._ . „. .„ v. . -1.-.'-J'-;

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19120907.2.36

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10714, 7 September 1912, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
286

PANAMA CANAL BILL Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10714, 7 September 1912, Page 5

PANAMA CANAL BILL Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10714, 7 September 1912, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert