SUPREME COURT SITTINGS
AN LNDU-SmiAL CASE. (By leiegrapn—Press AssociatScQ.) T h/^, L i Las * Night; Iho 1' ull Court sat this afternoon to 1 argument in two cases, Scott v Welsh. Tlie question is -as to the truo interpretation of rule 7 of the Sup3 me UTt C ° de ' wllicll states that where there are more than one town hokhng sittings'of the Supreme Court m the same judicial district, the place of trial shall be the town "most; convenient to the residence of de--7 Up< J n J ]lG answer to this question depends the place of trial for supreme Court actions coming from many towns north of Mar ton, on the Mam Trunk line. s T!he question jg whether actions should be tried at Wanganui or Palmerston N. In the first ease Mr L. Cohen, appears for the plaintiff, and Mr W. H. D. Bell S r I n . the second case, ?£ c - C ; gut-ton appears for the plaints, and Mr A. R. Meek for the defendant.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19120727.2.22
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10679, 27 July 1912, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
168SUPREME COURT SITTINGS Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10679, 27 July 1912, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Wairarapa Age. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in