Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN IMPORTANT CASE

(By Telegraph—Press Association.)

PALMTCRSTON IN., Last Xi S h<:

A' oasp of drnpwtaiiTO to farmero and seed merchants occupied tho aN tcntkti 'C.f the Supremo Court for three days. Mr Justkio Cbcper presided., : Kockk'.r and Holl-oy, Ltd, braght seventy 'acres of a 'standing crop of crested dogetaii ,fr,om Ellis Bros., Bulls, but .refused to take delivery on the! ground tkiit the g3ed was not first class and that -the- area was more than had (been stipulated.

On the latter ground an. inter-osing non-suit point was raised 'by Mr Myers for thia defence. Counsel contended that the contract note stated that Ellis. Bros, (undertook to supply seed from seventy acres, and raider the Sale elf Good? Act a contract ;rs to quantity had .to be exactly fulfilled.

Oil the other hand, it was held that a .contract for area was not a con • , tract for an exact quantity within the definition o,f the. Sale of Goods Act, floid that it would be impossible for it to lbe fc as the area was estimated and not according to survey, and it would he necessary for a. surveyor to follow the harvesters to get . exact measurements. Defend'auto admitted that .their -con- ; tract forms diid-n'ot provide for "mere j or lees," hut for exact areas. • The nan-suit, point was reserved, J but on the; other point, that the seed ■ was not ■first-class, judgment was civen for the plaintiffs, Ellis Bros, His Honor holding that th? defendants had n'o right to reject'the xsed.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19120702.2.25

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10674, 2 July 1912, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
251

AN IMPORTANT CASE Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10674, 2 July 1912, Page 6

AN IMPORTANT CASE Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10674, 2 July 1912, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert