WAIRARAPA SLANDER CASE
ARMSTRONG v. BOWLES. ' ■ (By Telegraph — "Press Association.) ■/~. WELLINGTON, Last Night. • A Masterton slandef action was before Mr Justice Edwards ait the Supreme Court to-day, .in'order that argument ion a- legal point-might be. .heard. The plaintiff was Sarah Emma Arm-, strong, widow, of Oartertoui, and the defendant Charles Bowles,.'farmer,; of Waihakeke. The-claim was for £5Ol on two causes of action. The plaintiff alleged that she had been defendant's housekeeper. He had accused her of stealing his money, and had ordered her out of the house. A Mastertoin , jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, with £IOO damages. Has Honour did not enter up judgment, but reserved the case for further consideration, in Wellington as to the question of privilege. After hearing (argument,, Mr Justice Edwards .reserved;bis decision.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19120508.2.20.22
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10630, 8 May 1912, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
129WAIRARAPA SLANDER CASE Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10630, 8 May 1912, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Wairarapa Age. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in