Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

QUESTION OF INTEREST.

WITHOUT AN ACREEMENT.

A 'case was heard in the Masterton; S.M. Count yesterday, in which W. B. Channels and Co. claimed £ll 14s 6<i from R. H. Hole for money, lent and interest thereon, and Hole entered a counter claim for £3 Is 6d. Am laameawled cladm *et out the particulars <more fully. Hoie admitted the cflaliim leas the interest. The .miomey was lent in- NovemVr of 1906. The plaintiff 'held that defendant had been credited with the £3 17i& 6d in' the isttiatemiente rend^rei 5 . Mr Jordan appeared for the plaintiffis, and Mr EColiiings for ;.'efendaivt. WiMfiam. ißoyce hemnelk said he had lent £lO, and defendant had. sent iihiree istetemenits on different oceasIkmis. Diefendiamt had never disputed rthe interest, aind. had promised to pay the account. No arrangement had been/ (made for the paymxrb <<£ interest. George Selar, one of the il»:«itiffis, corroborated the evidence conoertning the of ".he account.

Mr BJoMAnigßi confessed judgmnenit for £lO, but hie. isubniitited that interest could not be- rescweredwithout any agreement having been, mad©. Dedfendamt, in evidence, said' that there had flieiem mo arrangement for payment of imitterest or levem for repayment of Ithie £lO. It had been, ■understood thiat the £lO was to pay the expenses of showing a. person over wiitmesisi' property with a. view to am> exchange. Plaintiffs were to deceive oomimisision, from both , parties am the, event of ain> exchange being effected. Witness said he received th© £lO by post at Wellington.

W. B. Chenaiellls, re-called, denied that (the money wasi for expemisies', it

merely being a loam. The cheque was. govern to defendant ini Ma«(berttiMi', and not posted' ifcoWelliiimgiton.. De~ ifendanit did mot complain about being charged interest. Be had promisied to pay. In oaros-examimation, witmiei&s ©aid defendant had handed the cheque back and asked that it should be posted Ito ihiis wife in Wellington. Gfceorge Selar, re-called, cora-obor-attied the evidence .of the previous witness. Decisioni was (reserved. ;....■

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19110901.2.23.5

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10409, 1 September 1911, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
322

QUESTION OF INTEREST. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10409, 1 September 1911, Page 5

QUESTION OF INTEREST. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10409, 1 September 1911, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert