Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Wairarapa Age MORNING DAILY. FRIDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1910. THAT PAMPHLET.

The circulation of a disgraceful pamphlet, dealing with the. life history of Sir Joseph Ward and his family, was strongly deprecated in these columns some weeks ago, and opportunity was taken of stating that the Opposition bad absolutely no connection with the. cruel and mendacious thing. The mention of the matter in the House of Representatives by the Prime Minister gave the Leader of the Opposition an opportunity of officially disclaiming and responsibility , for "the circulation of the pamphlet, and of denouncing those who adopted such methods of damaging the character of a public man. It is to be regretted that individuals can be found in the community who will resort to contemptible tactics to besmirch and vilify the characters oi public men, Such individuals are deserving of the utmost censure. A man who serves his country in any public capacity is, of course, open to criticism. The more responsible his position, the more caustic _ and searching the criticism. And it is desirable, in the interests of the community, that this should be freely Remitted." But to subject the family and business relations of a public man to cruel, and mendacious scrutiny is-simply villainous. The Opposition has done a right - thing in scarifying the author and-publisher of 'the disgraceful publication, and it need only, be added that by doing so it has vastly improved its position. .in the country. Mr Massey and, his friends can find quite sufficient in the administrative' faults of the Government to destroy its claims'to pub-: lie confidence, without resorting to gross personal abuse. If it be true that the author of the pamphlet in fluestibu is acting within his -legal t'l-id.v\-:' Huii -i.lv. 1 "■.•-VA? thoJild sh/nr

its disapprobation of such scurrility by refusing to purchase such a disgraceful production. The Labour, or Socialist party, cannot hope to gain the sympathy of the people if it countenances such despicable conduct. The pity of it is that an attempt should have been made to father the delinquencies of one section of the community on to another which is entirely innocent.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19101202.2.8

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10130, 2 December 1910, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
354

Wairarapa Age MORNING DAILY. FRIDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1910. THAT PAMPHLET. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10130, 2 December 1910, Page 4

Wairarapa Age MORNING DAILY. FRIDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1910. THAT PAMPHLET. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10130, 2 December 1910, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert