Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN INTERESTING APPEAL.

(By Telesjrapn—Press Association.') WELLINGTON, Last Night.

The Appeal Court (all the Judges being present) sat this morning to hear the case Gualter, Dykes and Co. v. Bebb, an appeal from the judgment of a magistrate. The case is of unusual interest to shareholders, as it turns upon the construction of Sections 183, 135, 139, and 111 of .the Stamp Duties Act, 1908, containing provision relating to shares in mining companies • and the necessity for stamped contract notes in such cases. --u plaintiffs carried out many share transactions for defendant, and for the purpose of such transactions advanced monies and debited such advances in their books to defendant's account. Some dispute arose, and it became necessary for the plaintiff's to sue for their commission. ' The magistrate found a stamped contract note had not been given and this prevented the plaintiffs recovering commission, brokerage, and also balance of account. The plaintiffs now appeal, against the decision. Later. In the case Gualter, Dykes and Co. v. Begg, Mr. Skerrett, K.C., for the appellants, submitted that as the transactions had been completed and the respondent had had the benefit of the contract, the appellants were entitled to tne payment of the money advanced for the purchase of shares, although not on' the commission and brokerage. Mr. H. D. Bell, K.C., contended there was no difference between the contract that was void and unforceable and the illegal contract, and therefore the appellants could not recover. The object of requiring stamped contract notes, both from the buyer and the seller, was to make up for the stamp duty which would otherwise be charged upon the ] transfers, as in all cases in respect I to transfer of mining shares. The case was unfinished to-day. I

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19101015.2.22

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10120, 15 October 1910, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
291

AN INTERESTING APPEAL. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10120, 15 October 1910, Page 5

AN INTERESTING APPEAL. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 10120, 15 October 1910, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert