BREACH OF PRIVILEGE.
THE HIGH PEAK ELECTION. Received August 13. 8 25 a.m. LONDON, August 12. With reference to the House of Commons resolution declaring t the Duke of Norfolk was guilty of a breach of privilege in regard to the High Peak election, the Duke wrote stating that he had not author i-ed the publication of his letter to Mr Profumol If the Committee of Privileges desired his presence, added his Grace, he presumed application must be made to the House of Lords. The Commons Committee's decision in the matter has been adjourned.
On the 21st ult. the House of Commons resolved that the Duke of Norfolk was guilty of a breach of privilege in writing to Mr A. Frofumo. Unionist candidate in the byelection for High Peak Division of Derbyshire (where Mr Partington is seeking re-election) in fhe interest of ithe Catholic schools.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19090814.2.35
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 9568, 14 August 1909, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
145BREACH OF PRIVILEGE. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 9568, 14 August 1909, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Wairarapa Age. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in