Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WAS THERE POLITICAL INFLUENCE?

Our Carterton contemporary states that Mr J. A. Laurenson has been appointed agent for the Public Trustee in the South Wairarapa district, Mr Laurenson, it may be remarked in passing, is a partner of Mr J. T. M. Hornsby, ex-M.P., who unsuccessfully contested the Wairarapa seat in the Government interest at the last General Election. We do not know whether the statement of our Carterton contemporary is correct, but we understand that there are reasons for believing it to be true, and should such prove to be the case the general public will not only be greatly surprised, but will see in the apparent action of the Public Trustee an de-

merit that should be explained. Mr Laurenson may be most highly qualified to discharge the responsible duties that the appointment involves, but that is an aspect of the question that we are not discussing. The position really is this, that Mr W. B. Chennells, of Masterton, who has acted as agent for the Public Tru;tee for the Wairarapa for many years past, vsuh conspicuous ability and success, and who has been admitted by the Public Trustee to be one of nis best agents, is, without reason or warning, to have a large portion of his district taken away from him, which means, in effect, that he is to be ruthlessly deprived of a considerable portion of the agency which he has spent s.) many years in working up! Why? This is the question that should be answered by tha Public Trustee, or the Minister responsible, if such is the case, for the appointment of Mr Laurenson in place of Mr Chenneils. Is the Public Trust Office immune from political influence, or is it subject to the solicitous attention of Ministerial influence? Mr Chennells, if report speaks truly, has been treated most unjustly, but this, also, is a question that is quite apart from the one that is of real interest to the public. If the Public Trust Office is subject to political influence —even to the appointing of agents—it is a matter of the gravest concern to the public, and, therefore, with a view to obtaining information on the point, the reasons, in fullest detail, for the discarding of Mr Chennells' services should ba insisted upon.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19090125.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 3100, 25 January 1909, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
381

WAS THERE POLITICAL INFLUENCE? Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 3100, 25 January 1909, Page 4

WAS THERE POLITICAL INFLUENCE? Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXII, Issue 3100, 25 January 1909, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert