Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DISEASED FRUIT.

AUCKLAND, June 12. Mr Kettle, 8.M., gave his reserved decision to-day in the case .Arthur Tooman and Company v. Rcilly, Scott and Gill, of Ounedin, claiming £77 7s lOd. Defendants agreed to purchase 200 cases of bananas to arrive, if in good condition. They appeared to be in good condition on arrival at Auckland irom Fiji, and were transhipped to Dunedin, but they were then declared to be rotten with fruit fly and condemned. The Magistrate said he was forced to the conclusion the fruit was not of good quality when it left Auckland. He ordered a nonsuit with costs, leaving the part cs to make an ami - able settlement of the counter claim for loss of profits on the bananas.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19080613.2.15.5

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXI, Issue 9114, 13 June 1908, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
123

DISEASED FRUIT. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXI, Issue 9114, 13 June 1908, Page 5

DISEASED FRUIT. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXXI, Issue 9114, 13 June 1908, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert