Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A DRASTIC SENTENCE.

Christchurcli has had its sense of justice outraged by the decision of the Stipendiary Magistrate, a few days ago, to send thirteen men to prison for two months and five men for one month on a charge of trespassing on the Christchurch Public Racecourse Reserve. Ten thousand citizens are petitioning Parliament to interpose in what they consider to be a straining of the law. It appears that the magistrate, in dealing with similar cases on a previous occasion, had promised to send the next offenders to gaol, and he has kept his word. The question that now arises is whether he has exceeded reasor.ble bounds. The petitioners think he has. They state that the socalled trespass was not the ordinary offence so termed, but in reality a breach of a bylaw framed by the trustees of the Christchurch Public Racecourse Reserve, prohibiting betting except by means of the totalisttor. The prosecutions were initiated and carried on by the Canterbury Jockey Club with the sole object of protecting the revenue of thetotalisator, and were not authorised or countenanced by the Police Department. It is further alleged that, in addition to the above terms of imprisonment, the magistrate stated that he was determined that the costs of the club should be paid by the accused persons, or in default, an additional twenty days' imprisonment would be inflicted. This the petitioners characterise as "an unprecedented action." Certainly it is an unusual one, and so drastic as to suggest a feeling of vindictiveness on the part of the magistrate, but that it is not easy to suggest a motive for such a sentiment on the-part of a judicial officer. At any rate, the petitioners are firmly of the opinion that the sentences are unjustifiable, excessive, and not commensurate with the offences with which the men were charged,'and they contend that the accused have been sent to prison, not for the act of trespass, but for being rivals tor public favour in competition with the totalisator. The petitioners accordingly ask that the House of Representatives will take steps to commute the sentanc-es. We think the prayer contained in the petition will meet with fie approval of the public generally. As trespassers the men deserved to be punished, but justice might be satisfied by a monetary penally in'the case under notice.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19071119.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXX, Issue 8984, 19 November 1907, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
388

A DRASTIC SENTENCE. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXX, Issue 8984, 19 November 1907, Page 4

A DRASTIC SENTENCE. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXX, Issue 8984, 19 November 1907, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert