Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

MASTERTON—FRIDAY. (Before Mr W. P. James, S.M.) Alexander Smith was charged with having procured liquor for Mary Eelliher, knowing her to be prohiJaitedhMAccused, who was represented by! Mr P. L. Hollings, pleaded guilty. Sergeant Miller deposed to visiting Mrs Kelliher's house on September 30th, and finding defendant sitting at a tab© .with the woman, in front of whom was a bottle of boer. He said defendant was well aware that Mrs Kelliher was prohibited. Mr Hollings, while admitting that there was little to be said in extcnution of the offence, asked his Worship to consider that some people were often led to break the law by motives of sympathy, more especially .in regard to eases like the present one. The Magistrate aaid he could see no excuse for the accused's act. A fine u£ £5 with 12s costs, in default 14 days' imprisonment, would be imposed. A week was allowed in which to pay the line. Mary Kelliher was then charged with having procured liquor during she currency of a prohibition order against her. Defendant pleaded guilty, and was fined £2 and 7s costs, in default seven days' imprisonment. Mary McGuiken, an elderly woman, was charged with being an idle and disorderly person, and having insufficient lawful means of support. Accused denied the charge, but the Magistrate, after hearing the evidence of the police, sentenced accused to one month's imprisonment with hard labour. The Inspector of Factories proceeded against Wong Way Kee for transacting business after the statute ary closing hours. A fine of 10s with 7s costs was imposed. A similar charge was preferred against Hugh R6a. The Inspector said that defendant had previously been convicted for a similar offence, and the Department wished to suppress illicit trading.. ~A fine of £2 with 7s costs was in Jpßed.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19071005.2.30

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Wairarapa Age, Volume XXX, Issue 8549, 5 October 1907, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
301

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXX, Issue 8549, 5 October 1907, Page 7

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXX, Issue 8549, 5 October 1907, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert