THE MEIKLE COMMISSION.
DUNEDIN. May IT. The Meiirie Commission concluded taking evidence bere to-day, and will leave for WeUioctou in the morning. William Lambert's evidence varied but slightly from that gieou at tbo trial of Meikle'. He said that the company paid £SO in instalments to hia wife Uo oulv saw Camerou ouoe, and then in company with Troup. Ho hlwrjh beld that he was wrongfully convicted of perjury. The witness was cross examined by Mr Atkinson, but did not vary in his testimony. Troup, recalled, said he had heard about the letter written by Meikle about suing the company far £5,000, but he had never seen it, and Lambert was mistaken iu supposing he had given it to witness.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAG19060512.2.17.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Wairarapa Age, Volume XXVIX, Issue 8138, 12 May 1906, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
120THE MEIKLE COMMISSION. Wairarapa Age, Volume XXVIX, Issue 8138, 12 May 1906, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Wairarapa Age. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in