RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S, COURT. LAWRENCE,
(Before E. H, Carew Esq.,, R.M) Fbidat, Mat Ist'. M'Cartfy v. Kite King.* — Claim for goods sold and delivered and attendance on an entire* Credit was given for £3SQ, and the remainder* £70 Us., reduced to £50, ty> bring it.rwithu\ the jurisdiction of the Court. Mr. M'Coy for plaintiff ; Mr. Moukt for defendant. •A set-off of £11 10s. was put in 1 , oi which £5 was admitted, a»d not indebted pleaded as to the rest. Mr, M'Coy having opened the base, called Michael M'Carthy, settler, Moa .Flat, thet plaintiff, who deposed — In October, 1871, Mr* Xitching agreed with me that I should travel with an entire of his. He had before, offered, to sell it to me. When .he asked me to travel with it, I told him he could get a man to do that cheaper than I would. We finally agreed thai I should travel with i& I' was. to get the groom's fee, £3 a week, and all expenses paid. I took the horse, and Had him for 6 weeks under this agreement, .when hedied. Wad travelling with him h. days to^ Cljde and back; also, several trips,' to the Teviot aud back. The horse died in my stable. He was continually in my charjji for the whole six weeks. My object in/travelling; was to show the horse round, and make engagements for mares. I got 7-0-or. 80 mare* promised. Some time after the death of the horse I saw latching, who directed me to. deliver the harness and the shoes , to hia | groom, which I did. I. was to publish, thehorse in my own name, by Satching's authority^ He said he had had a horse before, bitt could get no mares for him, and thought the peopledid not care for him. I paid as much as" 225. 6d. a night at the Dunstan for a box an/I my own expenses. It cost me £16 or £TJ% the time I was away to Clyde. I had to, " shout " a good deal in getting customers.. I estimatethe expense of the horse wheo, in my stable as 10s. a day., When I first saw the horse, I told Kitching it was not in good health, Made no charge for the use ttf my awn stable. " Shouting " is generally done by persons in the trade. It might cost 4s. or ss, to- get & mare. When the horse died, I told Kitching he had cost me about £50. He said, " that is all right, Michael." Understood him ta mean that he would give me a cheque for it at any time. Some time after I asked bin,
) W^flWttemenV Ho told hie- hid Neville to — up hia boots, and he was no good. If I ; • wanted money he would give me some* About \ ,18 months ago he offered me 13 sheep instead I of the money due for the entire. ' I said I | Would take therm The reason I now charge him for the expenses of the horse is that I hear he is going to take the sheep away from me, and I have no*ttriting about the sheep. ■ ,>££•! haa" any writing about the sheep, I would i my claim jibaut the horse. I have \§pld .i<» i£6. They are horned 'X>Q*rtbv 1 value them at £100. The items in the account for goods sold were supplied by myself or my wife* My, wife entered the amounts by my direction in the book. I cannot writ© myself. The goods were delivert&leither to- servants of Kitching's or at the station. The 3 head of cattle sold were fgptehased by me from Mr. Lancaster. The , price at wMqh Etching bought from nic was Wreed ,upon between us* Last Monday, offered me £30 as balance due to 1 'toe. ' I did not tabs it. About 30tb January, ;1874 ; 1874, 1 got a cheque for £30 from him. I. i liave t br6dited'himwith that. Mr. Etching , has paid .on former occasions for goods delivered' to" his 'servants as these were. He never disputed the account. I admit .25 bushels of oaU in set-off; also, £5 for service for my mare, except sb. for groom's fee, whifeffj paid:> , 0 Cross-examined by Mr. Mouat — Both of us reside at.Moa Flat ; Etching 18 or, SO miles ' from the Teviofc. I reside about 4J miles from, the TflTiotj The cheque was given to mV^M 'a credit on his account. Mrs. McCarthy was present. A great deal was said about a sale of my property. Mr. Etohing did not self the horse to me. He spoke first to mi about the hors* in his own house about October, 1871. ' He said he had bought a horse that would suit the district well. I said that it must.be a very good horse then., The horse I Had the provioua season h*d di«d. Asked, me what I wanted to travel with him. Told him he could get cheaper man than me. He said it was not the horse but the man. He. was agreeable to pay me £3 a week for the season, and all expenses. Had not seen then. He agreed to my terms. When '^P saw the' horse I told him it would not stand the season^ . He said that was all rot. He told me ( tp, take the horse and I would do a good' season, 'he kne^ Nothing further was Baid about an agreement. On one occasion I said to- Mr. Etching I wanted some money. He gaye I 'ma a cheque for £30, and said he would make up the rest when he had time. This was on the 4th February, I think. It is the same cheque T spoke of before. The expenses of the entire were paid by me and incurred in my. Qwn name. I took no receipts. I paid ready money. Horse was bad for 3 weeks. . I have a good memory, and remember all the.se things clearly. The documents produced are, I think, in my wife's hand writing. I supplied, to Mr. Etching 640 bushels oats ; 525 were price of colt I purchased from him. All the oats I have' supplied him this year is ' 18 bushels. Swear positively Mr. Xitching agreed to give me those sheep in settlement about; the Jborse account: This was about 18 months ago. There was a shearing since then. ' I sent the wool to Mr. Etching, as he said that he could sell it for me. If he takes the sheep away, I will charge him for their grass. The reason I think he may take them is that he has told people they are not mine. I considered I could do as I liked with the sheep. Etching said he would get the wool scoured, done up, and sell it for me. (Paper A put in, dated 7th March, 1874, shows no oredit far £30 oheque. Book put in shows following entry :— Debit, £47 12s. 9d. ; Feb. 4, by cash, £30; 60 cornsacks, £4 10s.; balance of account, £22 12s. 9d.) Mr. Etching did not sell the entire to me. Nothing was ever said about selling the entire to me. [ I advertised the horse and paid for it myself. Had I not done so I should never have a mare. The card produced refers to the entire. It was called Young Blaize. Paddook referred to is one of my own. Mr. Etching said if I had more mares than I had room for I might put them on the run. It was to his interest to let them run there. . .There was no provision that I was to get paid for use of my paddock. Served only one mare. . None came to my paddook. Mr. Etching made no arrangement with me about ' the use of my paddock, , I told Mrs. M'Carthy to make out' an acknowledgment for £30 in favor of Mr. Etching. She did so immediately after cheque was given. She made out /a receipt, and Mr. Etching pub on a stamp.' She signed it. No document was read out to me before the receipt was given. Mr. .Etching and I had several- glasses of ■ grog together. He asked me if I had not offered my place for sale. This was on a Sunday. . Nothing mare was said about the sale of my place then. He spoke about it before in walking over my paddock. He said if I sold he would like to get my place to build a large corn store on. I never told anyone after this that I had sold my place to Mr. Etching, and would contradict anyone who said so. I afterwards agreed with Dick Lancaster. tp t thresh my oats. Agreed with him on the day I got cheque. In the evening I did ndt' agree. 'with him, but I did after- - wards. '• Lancaster put in an account for 120 bushels more than there were. I refused to Gy it*- He said he would pull me for it. I ye heard that Mr. Etching has paid Lancaster in mf name. He-examined by Mr. M'Coy — Had no agreement , with, Mr. Lancaster as to price. I was to pay .the same as others. Always paid sd. » bushed ' The £16 or £17 was, all spent in drinks and expenses with horse. About £8 was spent in drinks. Horse was in my own viable about five weeks. When I vent to Teviot it ,coet.2s., or, 3s. Had agreement with Mr. Etching to tak»the»h*ep in settlement for all matters in connection with the horse. The sheep were delivered to me upon that Agreement. Have a small threshing machine. Emily M'Carthy, wife of plaintiff, examined by Mr. M'Coy — I keep my husband's books. The , accounts with Mr. Etching are all in my handwriting. My husband told me what -entries totnako, and I entered a» he told me. My. husband travelled with an. entire of Mr. Etching's.'. Heard Mr. Etching ask my /husband two or three times what terms he would ask, tp travel with the horse. I bought ' -eggs for- the, horse and gave them to his men. I sent him a bill for the eggs once (marked P.) ,Haye seen him since, and he never disputed it. , I., put the entry "by cosh, £30," when h.e ; paid "the cheque. y7tjtii^m,,'W'augli — Have had some ex'perie^ce in. travelling with entires. Think , M(Caj?ijhy vB.v 8. estimate of expenses which I heard jquite.'M^sonabre. " Shouting-" is usual when travelling with an entire, but not necessary. Feed of entires is /more expensive than that of •vther horses. A fair charge for feeding would 'be 255. a week. • Cfoja-examined — What were you to give lor th* .place? Objected to and not allowed. Archibald M'Phereon, stockman in the .employment of Mr* Etching — Have sometimes got goods for Mr. Etching from Mr. McCarthy without any written order. For,£he.defence, Mr* Mouat said that most of 'the'itemsfor goods sold and delivered were admitted He called , Alexander Grant, book-keeper at Mr. Xitching's station — The price for the service t«f . Ivsnhoe ima £5 6*., exclusive of groom's fee, iftade oat bill fer M'Carthy oa that 'bfjAt. ',' JolmFry Btcfc&«, manager of MoaFUt Station.— l,^fev|W giving M'Carthy cheque fpr^&O. .. ,1 bqjigkt hia plae* and all oa it for JB^OOi aridepaid a cheque for £30— the same |»rod*ced,j)y the plaintiff to-day. ' mW Mouat "here stated there was a case -"pBS<Eng~in the Supreme Court between the . -tani .parties to enforce the sale, and requested '- ari'iftdjoumment of this case for one month,, to apply to the Supreme *©6tu#t^?e i ißpyJ!,the case there. . --Ad^ourruaeiit granted. ,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18740506.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Tuapeka Times, Volume VII, Issue 353, 6 May 1874, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
1,917RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S, COURT. LAWRENCE, Tuapeka Times, Volume VII, Issue 353, 6 May 1874, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.