RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, ROXBURGH.
(Before J. B. Borton, Esq., R.M)
M. McCarthy was charged on information with wilfully and maliciously shooting a filly, the property of A. MThai 1 . The information was amended to " wilfully shooting." After hearing evidence, the case was dismissed. Mr. M'Coy appeared for defendant.
McCarthy v. M'Phail— Claim for £10 for trespass. Judgment was given for the amount claimed, with costs. Mr. M'Coy for plaintiff.
A . M'Kenzie was charged witli sly grog selling. Mr. M'Coy appeared for the defence. The case was dismissed, on the ground that no payment was proved, nor was the strength of the liquor proved to be within 2o of 100 proof, which is the definition of spirituous liquors in the Licensing Ordinance, under which the information was laid.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18720222.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 212, 22 February 1872, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
127RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, ROXBURGH. Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 212, 22 February 1872, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in