THE CASE OF FORSYTH VERSUS KITCHING.
(To tU Editor.)
Sir, — In the case of Forsyth v. Kitching, heard before Judge Grey on the 12th instant (which I trust you will report in your issue of Thursday next), Mr. Kitching stated, on oath, tint the men engaged with my son and the late .Mr. Fry would not work unless guaranteed by Mr. Kitching. As I ha.l previously been examined, I had not an opportunity to state the f Mowing facts, viz., that Mr, Fry had capital of his own, added to which were my son's services and my own resources, which, together, would have been a sufficient guarantee for the wages of all the assistance necessary for executing an infinitely larger scouring than Mr. Kitching required done, and therefore' his guarantee., wa3 quite unnecessary and uncalled for '; and such an aspersion upon p.u,r character, and especially npon that of the deceased, shows not only very bad taste, but ungentletnanly conduct. — I am, <Sjc, Jambs Forsyth,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18710622.2.18
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 176, 22 June 1871, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
164THE CASE OF FORSYTH VERSUS KITCHING. Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 176, 22 June 1871, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in