Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WARDEN'S COURT.

(Before W. L. Simpson, Esq , Warden.) •< THfKSDAV, 2nd March. Leivis v. Livingston. — Mr. Copland for plaintiff, and Mr. Gooday for defend^;: This was an application for a dissolutio:^.:-- 1 of a mining partnership. After a., con-*'* sidorable amount of unintarestiiig < evidence having been adduced, the case was adjourned till Monday.

Monday, March 6. Lewis v. Livingston,. — (Adjourned ca^e) This case again came" on for hearing. 1-*1 -* — Further -evidence of an uninteresting character was adduced. The case was again adjourned for the production of receipts.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18710309.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 161, 9 March 1871, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
86

WARDEN'S COURT. Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 161, 9 March 1871, Page 5

WARDEN'S COURT. Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 161, 9 March 1871, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert