RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, LAWRENCE.
(Before W. L. Simpson, Esq., R.M-) Saturday, Dec. 19. M'Swiney v. Ward.— Claim, £11. It appeared in this case that the defendant, who was residing at the Teviot, failed, and that the amount sought to be recovered was duly inserted in his schedule, which was produced. Case dismissed.
Monday, Dec. 19. (Before the same Magistrate.)
Keen v. Bastings, Coverlid, Barnett, Williams, Mears, Uren, and Harrou, being the present City Council. — Claim, £20, being amount due plaintiff for assessment and expenses of action brought against the city council. Mr. M'Coy, the solicitor for the Corporation, asked for an adjournment, as one of his principal witnesses was absent Mr. Keen had no objection, providing that he should not be put to any costs by the adjournment. Granted.
Labes v. Ross. — Claim, £6, being the amount of an 1.0. U. Mr. M'Coy appeared for the defendant, and asked for an adjournment. Granted at the expense of defendant.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18701229.2.20
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 151, 29 December 1870, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
158RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT, LAWRENCE. Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 151, 29 December 1870, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in