WARDEN'S COURT.
(C-fn.. \Y. L. Simpson, E 3 q., Warden.) Tuesday, 29th November.
Ah Pue and others v. All Chun and o-hera. — Mr. Gooday for the plaintiffs :m'{ Hr. : i '-J.iy for the defendants. Air! ;■>',- .,; r -1.0 Chinese Interpreter, being «.boeiu, :;._ <_natt was postponed till Thurs° day.
Millard and others v. Cullen and others. -Mr M'Coy for the defendants Tins was an objection to the issue of a certificate for an extended claim situated at Wetheratones.
The evidence was very conflicting and uninteresting: Mr. M'Coy endeavoured to show that the plaintiffs had n.»t marked out their claim as required by the regulations and the decision of the Warden in Hardy v. Coombe, and, therefore, were not in a position to object to any part of their supposed claim bums? encroached on, aa th^y were nut legally entitled to the possession of tlie ground .. LI is Woivship said that hu was not satisfied by the evidence, but would visit and inspect the gronnd. Hunter and party v. M'Laraa and party, Wetherstones.— Defendants wjre charged with encroaching on plaintiff's claim The Warden to uait the ground before giving judgment.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18701201.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 147, 1 December 1870, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
187WARDEN'S COURT. Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 147, 1 December 1870, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in