KEIR V. MORR ISON.
(To the Editor of the Tuapeka Tints.) Sir, — As the report of the case Kiir r. Morrison in the It.M.'s C.mrt requiivs further explanation to placa it j"is>ly before the public, not only t> correct false impressions, but to settle the m ifcter of the moral obligations of the defendant. I wish to ask whether it occurred to the reporter that the witness Bach m received the money (which he v entitled to if he did not), but it' he did receive :b, upon what principle of justice is defendant morally bound to pay a second time to Keir ? Truly, the showing of your reporter in this case is worthy of noric>, and may be applicable to the high stata of morality of this place, where legitimate debts are so easily collected. — I am, Ac., Fair Play. Lawrence, Sept. 24, 1870.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18700929.2.17
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 138, 29 September 1870, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
145KEIR V. MORRISON. Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 138, 29 September 1870, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in