Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AGRICULTURAL LEASES v. MINING

(To the Editor of the Tuapeka Times).

Sir, — Some people living down this way are anxiotis to know what is to become of the land lately relinquished to the Chinamen by Mr. Fitzgerald, at the monstrous price of £15 an acre. Does it remain the property of the Chinaman, or does it fall into the hands of the Crown ? I have good reason to know those Chinamen who bought the right to work the ground have had to pay dear for their whistle. When the ground referred to was first envied by the Chinamen, who had ideas of their own that it would pay well, and when arbitrators were appointed to decide the value of it, I watched with great interest the arbitration case, as it was the first, and was looked upon as an experiment. I watched it, but I never was more miserably disappointed in my life. The arbitration was altogether onesided. From what I hear, the Chinamen have worked the ground and not found as much as pay the amount the arbitrators charged for their labourious work of listening to one-sided evidence. Now, sir, I ask what is all this tending to ? Has the result of those arbitrators' decision been beneficial to the district ? On the contrary, I say the precedent which they set up in the case of Mr. Fitzgerald's land has been most prejudicial to the best interests of the districts. The fictitious value placed on the land will have the effect of driving away every Chinaman from the district, and it is well known we cannot afford to lose any more than we have done. What has been the result of that bad precedent? This is it, everybody in the district now wants £15 an acre for his miserable patch, and hopes the Chinamen will come soon and make him. an offer ; but John is not to be done in that way, he will rather try fresh fields and pastures new, and the cockatoos will then find their produce will suffer a depreciation in value, and regret the day they drove the Chinamen from the district. — I am, &c, Hard Times. Tuapeka Flat, June 14, 1870.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18700616.2.19

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 123, 16 June 1870, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
366

AGRICULTURAL LEASES v. MINING Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 123, 16 June 1870, Page 5

AGRICULTURAL LEASES v. MINING Tuapeka Times, Volume III, Issue 123, 16 June 1870, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert