Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE COAL QUESTION

■..-— ,►_ — Discussion in Commons * LO^DOX, July 14 iiitiie waa a lauge atcenaaiice ai, Uio ii-o-a^e oi Couiaious 00-uay tor fhe\debace oja the coal siuuauow. Sir Auclkiand Geddes said the increase in the price was not based on, political motives; >rt was solely due to the reduced output. One factor was insufficient transport fol-j ljowing the railwaymen'a 8-hour I day. The outstanding fact was that j the country work was not being [ ' done.. Profound, and sudden in- ; i dustrial change® were causing a, widespread disturbance, even in outside trades. Where changes were introduced! a national effort was ne- • . cessary to increase the coal output, which was a vital necessity. The subsidty derived; from export profits was falling daily. If it disappeared, , the price must rise another Is -4d a ton. The country must also face .rises in prices of coke, pig iron, steel, spelter, gas, electric power, railway and ship plates. i Mr. Brace, a Labour member,, described the speech by Sir A. j Geddes as utterly depressing, and constituted' a strong condemnation of the policy of the Government in failing to take the House into* confidence, or to ask for co-operation. He urged the Government to delay the imposition of the t>s increase, and confer with the miners and owners, with a view to increasing the output. The miners would have greater faith in the Government if it carried! the recommendations embodied: in Judge, SadEey's report. The miners believed that nationalisationi was , the 'key to the^ ■ situation!. Mr. Brace said further that the; Government would withhold putting ■ an increase of 6s into operation if the • milnersi would) co-operate with \ the Government in trying to increase < the output. Mr. Bonafr Law said in reply that . if the miners would give an undertaking that there'would be no stop- r page of work for three months, the Government would be , inclined to , defer the increase; Meanwhile the price would not. be increased until . ■next Monday, thus allowing the j conference of miners on Thursday : to consider the matter.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS19190717.2.19

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume LII, Issue 13938, 17 July 1919, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
337

THE COAL QUESTION Thames Star, Volume LII, Issue 13938, 17 July 1919, Page 3

THE COAL QUESTION Thames Star, Volume LII, Issue 13938, 17 July 1919, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert