Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHURCH & DEMOCRACY.

AT CtROSS FUEFOSER Chir dables recently referred to sonio tvtanchant. utterances delivered at the B'aptisfc Congress on the attitude of the chm'ch to thci masses and tho reasons for the studied and contemptuous aloofness of many, especially the laibouring! classes, from the church. Tho Rev. A: Collins was unsparing in his criticism and u'e no'lethat the Congress was enthusiastic in endorsing the views of thei speakers and were unsparing ill their oritk-i----isms of Ivith sides. T'lio 11-: v. Collins sjxjikel of tlie «x>r.<lnj> at the shrine of "the gjoddws ..f. gettiug on" and. said; tho clmro'ics ] would 'be hopelessly ruined if they wer 1 heicaine "cselusirei" churches. The ideal ciiurch Was one where ridi «ud jKXia' meet together on terms of Christian equality. He conifenined-the church whe»ii the- rich with their faults (and full purser) were welcom-. c<\> while the poor, mrncst. Qint with lean pockets) werte received with mhi. ness. Tiie speaker maintaine«l that the fhuu'di arid tlie maVsvs v>n- a' Varianoo on ths question of ri^.h' aw-.l wrong. Tha church v.as vairnc '"■n "sin," and the tuys^cs cmeiete tho ■word, and t:ilk' of «nti-x"'-ial conditions, of sweating nn<\ i:u-n«ipolic«. Ho urged thnfc the demewracy and tho clmrch' sliCTild "fuse" and lfet lid'-..

and cease to emphasise, the points of difference between clmreh and hhor,

and seek to diseo'vler the points) of likeness and 1 agr^jmetit. And the church should make the first advlance. Th® doming of the democracy demanded that, if the demooraicy iieed--eil' to, be CSiristia.nisedl, the church needled;.: to ble 'detajowratised. ■ ,T!he! damocratic movement was btecoming mdrei and: mgre' religiolus. The reaching, oj the mouses Wasi not a- question of old or n©;w thitology; it was' methodl " "Ask the woi-fking men, and they will tell you bluntly that they db not want raw iish or stalej fish, but good fisih." Tlie ciliurch must attract, not by buffoonery in the 1 pulpit- or vulgarity, in the pew, but-by erecting buildings that compelled attention, and not'treating! him as a simpleton or a sientimemtalisit. It was

necessary! for the' church to convince, and the appeal must li|e.toi reason and conscience. They must be ..passionate, and We patient as "wtetQ.'

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS19110501.2.13.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume XLVII, Issue 10354, 1 May 1911, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
362

CHURCH & DEMOCRACY. Thames Star, Volume XLVII, Issue 10354, 1 May 1911, Page 2

CHURCH & DEMOCRACY. Thames Star, Volume XLVII, Issue 10354, 1 May 1911, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert