WELLINGTON.
This day. The Tarringl Case. Tbe Hutt tarriog case came on again yjbe B f M. Court this morning, when
William Dap son (of the firm of Dawson and Co., ironmongers) was examined, but his evidence was unimportant. George Irons, partner in the firm, deposed that during the last month a pair of handcuffs was sold by his firm, of which there was an entry in the sales book, giving the name of the purohaser. the entry being mode by Connal. Witness never saw Mr Waters in the shop. The tar brush (produced) was the same as those in witness's stock, but would not swear it was pur« chased from them. MrTravers intimated that he intended to submit the tar brush to Mr Skey, analyst, for the purpose of removing the tar on the handle, to ascertain if there were any private marks on it. The case was adjourned until 2 p.m , when Connal, salesman at Dawson's, will be examined as to who purchased the; handcuffs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18850915.2.10.4
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume XVII, Issue 5199, 15 September 1885, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
167WELLINGTON. Thames Star, Volume XVII, Issue 5199, 15 September 1885, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in