Correspondence.
THK BREAD QUESTION. (To the Editor of the EVBNIK& STAB.)
Sib,—l am very sorry to trouble you with any more letters on the above subjeot ( but as all the random shafts which are being fired are aimed at my deroted head, I trust you will forgive me. My old friend, "Fair Trade," after hibernating for about a fortnight, has, like a bottle of ginger -beer "well up," again exploded. I really feel sorry that he should hare wasted so much time in composing a letter * which contains next to nothing of praotical utility. He admits, that a great part of my letter was unanswerable, but the first part of " Fair Trade's " last effusion would puzzle a Philadelphian lawyer. Regarding the number of loaves a ton of flour will make, let me inform " Fair Trade " that the challenge I threw out to" Doughboy" (who was not man enough to take it up) is still open. I ant prepared to giro £5 to the Ladies Benevolent Society if " Fair Trade" can get a baker to do what I asked, even a London baker would not do it, although we are led to believe they are such exceedingly clerer fellows. " Fair Trade " says there was no absurdity about the Home contract at 3|d per 4 lb loaf, but. there is a - deal of inconsistency about .-.". Fair Trade." In his first letter he said the I aTerage price of flour here is £10 per ton, but that in England it was £4 per \ ton more, thus making it £14 per ton; now ia his last letter " Fair Trade!" in order to show there was no absurdity in the price of bread at Home, quotes flour iv England at from £8 10s to £9 per ton; therefore, flour at Home has suddenly dropped £5 per ton, according to his statements. " Fair Trade " must cither be in the grocery line, ot else is wilfully ignorant of the large profits in the grocery business; and if he is the head of a family, he must know that the amount a housekeeper expends weekly in groceries is about four time,* what is spent in bread. "F.T." would l«?*d us to believe that grocers only only sell " mustard, spice, and pills." How about tea?—on which there is usually 30 per cent, profit, and there are many other tL things on which grocers make excellent fl^profits, as I can prore, by having bought groceries wholesale. One word more:
if carpenters and other mechaoici only get one week's work in- four, let me tell " lair Trade" that in manj instances on thto field at the present time the bakers supply them with bread the other three, and get rery little money in return. As " Fair Trade" has agreed to close this discussion, so will I. I think, Mr Editor, that in all my letters I hare been consistent, and I believe that most unbiassed minds will agree with me, that although the bakers are making a fair proSt, considering the disadvantages under which they labour, it is best to let them alone.—l am, &c.. ' Pbactical. P. S.—l expect to see this letter torn to .; pieces by some of the promoters of the co-operative bakery, but I shall not writ* again on this subject.-?—P.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18850216.2.18
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume XVI, Issue 5022, 16 February 1885, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
543Correspondence. Thames Star, Volume XVI, Issue 5022, 16 February 1885, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.