THE BREAD QUESTION.
(To the Editor of the Evening Stab.)
Sib,—lt was not, my intention to have : laid anything more on the above subject, : bnt after the lengthy effusion by " An Old London Dough*boy" in your last issue, I think I am entitled to a few words. His
Ir't er contains a good deal of maudlin sentiment over _ the wey in which the bikers overcharge the paying public. It is my own opinion—and I believe most people with their senses about them will oee it—that under the guise of a philan-
thropist, ." An Old Dough boy " wishes to secure a good position with a good salary «■ manager of this proposed bakery. The same thing has been done before to-day, •nd in the present instance looks very much like it. I hardly fancy be will get 32G0 shares at 5s each (fully paid up) taken up al the present state of the money market on the Thames ; and quite agree with "Dough-boy " that £800 is not in the least too mnch to start such a vast
affair as a Cooperative Grain, Flour, Bread, Biscuit, and Small Goods Store. "Dongh'boy" again asserts that my figures concerning the price of flour and freights are incorrect, but when he be* .comeimanager of the Thames Co-operative --, Grain, Flour, Bread, Biscuit, and Small .' Goods Store he will come to the conclu- , aion that I have not much over-stepped - ■ the mark: N6w concerning the number of loaves a tack of flour of 2001bs will yield, I will not waste words on " DoughDQy," bat put him to a practical test. I challenge " Dough-boy "' (who professes to be a practical baker) to prove by ocular , demonstration that he can make over 140 - 21b turnover loaves out of a sack of flour
■'• containing 2001 bs, the flour to cost not • more than at the rate of £10 10s per ton - delivered into the bakehouse. I have
made arrangements with one of our lead- * ing Bakers for the use of his bakehouse and oven,. and he has further promised ' that-if." Dough boy" can make more than 140 21b loaves out of a sack of flour
, he,will give him the flour. If "Dough- : boy " accepts the challenge, he will please ,-, send his. name and address to " Practical," ' care Stak Office, and I will return mine.
,:j.\V*e ran then.see .each other, and make arrangements. If he does not take up the gauntlet, I shall denounce him as an importer and a sham, unworthy the confidence of the public—l am, &c, • ■■;■. . '■? ■ ' ' ; " PRACTICAL i VP:S.~"-Doogh-boy must use no alum -• or other chemicals.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18850203.2.22.2
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume XVI, Issue 5011, 3 February 1885, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
427THE BREAD QUESTION. Thames Star, Volume XVI, Issue 5011, 3 February 1885, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.