CIVIL SIDE.

Thames Star, Volume XV, Issue 4838, 11 July 1884, Page 2

CIVIL SIDE.

Judgment fob Plaintiffs.

Forgie ?. Bird.—Claim £6 11s 9d, for goods. Mr Miller for plaintiff; costs £1 12s. .■.-,■• ■•■■■- .;■■ ■■-■„ ■■- ■

Gilardo :\v.: Magnolia G.M. Co.—Mr Miller for plaintiff. Claim £7 15s, for wages; coits 26s 6d. - Green v. Kickits. — Cliiml 10s, for damage donejo plaintiff's window by the defendant's child falling through it. It appeared .that the child was playing with other children on the footpath when the accident happened. Costs 13s. Forgie V. Keepa Te Wharau.—olaim, £4 19s, for goods. . Judgment ; Mears and Co. v. J. B. Kilian.—Claim, £13 13s lid. Mr Mears gave evidenceof defendant's ability' to pay, and an order was made that;the amount, with costs' £3 Is, be paid in instalments of £1 per I week, defendant to be liable to one month's imprisonment in default of any payment. . " { ■''■■' "■■'( •■■'■£.■* Difendid Cases.

Forgie v. Hohepa Hikairi and Rawiri Whakaiti.—Claim; £11 14s sd, goods supplied.—Mr Miller appeared for the plaintiff,"and Mr Lush for the defendants and admitted £2 14s against Hawiri.—J. Forgie proved the debt, which was for ' bread, sugar, &c, ordered by both defendants.—-Both defendants were examined, tfawiri admitting part of the liability. Judgment was given against Bawiri for £6, and costs £2 Is, and the remainder of the claim was struck out to allow separate action to be taken against Hohepa.' Freeman r. Harold.—Claim, £5 6s 6d for wages. The defence was that sufficient credit had not been given by plaintiff for money by .him-due to defendant. After hearing plaintiff, defendant, and defendant's mother, judgment was given for £110s 6d, and costs £3.45. Execution was stayed for 14 days to allow the present defendant to be sued for money alleged to be •• due by him to plaintiff. W ADJOUriKED CASEB. The following cases were adjourned till next Court day :—Buehanan v. Barret, Douglas v. Brown, McGregor v.-Matßhan, Eamo Coal Co. v. Winding Association. The Court then rose.