Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TIMARU.

In the Supreme Court, th*eMe'H»J hurst ,t. Matthews and Trefisee wwea IriretwfHjtf a, genenl refdirfc fp* the defeadant being given. *n interesting ifHiMt arose m the case. OttfeL of^jbe covenants of th« tease wife that threeWn* SButive corn crops tboaid Jp takes off c land: r JPbe eridwee of triers! experts and lengthy arguments were heard as/t<» whether the lessor intended by'this core* , Ant to forbid the sowing of 4he thitd [wheat, or whiter, f«?'i*K4£ v .forbid the growing to maturity or the . { t\ftfL «rop. (j Did grain crop meWtnrnips, rapej, potatoei, beans, etc., of cosldimso <»*e9^M; < OPfl? 11! ' ' were 3irid»d, t>ut »« tW Skfewiant htd • mt thr-*ird'Cfi» whoh mw»nip^itwr» • »tatg t the jqry foopcl for t&em: >. „- —-^

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18830623.2.11.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume XIV, Issue 4514, 23 June 1883, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
117

TIMARU. Thames Star, Volume XIV, Issue 4514, 23 June 1883, Page 2

TIMARU. Thames Star, Volume XIV, Issue 4514, 23 June 1883, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert