Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT

THIS DAY. ' ;I CBefore H. Kenrick, Esq., R.M; J. t. STEVENS V. KNEEBONE. ; .i Judgment summons, £8 2s 2dc :-A The defendant deposed that this was a joint debt .between, three, .and he did not see'why-he should* pay'for4hs other two. HeThad been working at the sawmill," earning 8s a day since April, but there had been a stoppage for. six weeks. Had a wife and Jhree children. M*|Steveris offered him employment when he;was in a .tribute... •■ Case" adjourned for four weeks, 5s & .week to be ; paid,. and so on (ill the debt is "paid. If defen4af t,ihouid; be. out 60j|ork. 'order to betsuspended. ■"* ":'^ i \

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18820929.2.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume XIII, Issue 4289, 29 September 1882, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
107

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Thames Star, Volume XIII, Issue 4289, 29 September 1882, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Thames Star, Volume XIII, Issue 4289, 29 September 1882, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert