CIVIL SIDE.

Thames Star, Volume XII, Issue 3962, 9 September 1881, Page 3

CIVIL SIDE.

, Adjoxtened Cases. „,. Thorp v.i.Creagh,' for one montb; Merimana Eoriui v. W. H. Taipari, one month ; Collins v. Alii Pepene. next Court day;- M. G. Power v. Mimiha, next Court day. Defended Cases. WINIFRED HEALY V. WM. STEVENSON. Claim, £6 4s 3d, goods supplied. , h; Mr'Brassey appeared for plaintiff. ■ Winifred' Dalziel, wife of George Dalziel, proved the debt. A sum of £2 4s had ,been received on occoant; ■ r :'iTJudgment for plaintiff for £4 Os^3d and costs.^lTsed',.^ ). ■- ■:;;■ .--■^ ■ • '■":!',' l ' 1,1:' i'il,'....'-'!W I'.'i)EßW. T. 8..W888i- \ 1 ;Claim, £7 10s, balance of wages for 30 weeks. Mr Brassey for plaintiff, and Mr Miller for t,he defendant.. • This was a claim for surplus wages, the plaintiff claiming that he was to have received £2 per week. The defence was that Drew was engaged for 355. ! The evidence for the complainant went to prove that Drew understood that he was to receive £2 per week after a certain .;time.;'! ■■'■'"''■'■'- ■'■•'■■■ ■ , t i The defence was that no agreement was made that Drew was to receive £2 yer week, and Drew had never claimed the extra wages ifx any way until after he left Webb'sservice. „, ■ ; .'■'• His ( W6rship then summed up, and said upon the merits of the case be could but give a nonsuit, with costs, £2 3s.