RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT
THIS DAY
(Before H. Kenrick, Esq., 11.M.) DRUNKENNESS. One person pleaded guilty to i.he above charge, but as it was his first offence, and he had beeu locked up all uight, he was discharged. TAIPABI V. ADLAiI. Mr Brassey made au application for a re-hearing in this case, on the ground that further material evidence had beeu discovered since the case was heard. He put in a affidavit from the defendant affirming this. Mr Miller contended that the affidavit did not set forth what new evidence was to be adduced, and was therefore invalid. His Worship coincided with Mr Miller's theory, and Mr Brassey therefore applied for an adjournment to enable him to amend the affidavit. . The case was accordingly adjourned till next Monday. Court adjourned.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18810820.2.18
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume XII, Issue 3945, 20 August 1881, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
129RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Thames Star, Volume XII, Issue 3945, 20 August 1881, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in