Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Art of Destruction.

The curious theory was recently ad* vanced by the Saturday Beview tbat, aftjer a few more- improvements in fire* „ arms there will be no more battles. There is a suggestion that this result may have already been reached in! naval warfare, in the fact that neither in the Franco Prussian nor the' Btisso-Turkish wars was there any naval battle of consequence, although all the combatants bad squandered immense' sums of money on their navies. The inference is tbat, knowing' that in. certain contingencies their forces might be exterminated, they forbore to run the risk of exposure to hopeless destruction. The Be* view argues that this will be the ultimate result of contests between nations which equip our armies with weapons which will probably be invented during the', next half century. War will become a, species of game, and the army which, when brought face to face with a strong force,, realises. that it will be. annihilated. .. if it enters into an engagement will yield without fighting. Iv that very excel* lent and carefully-edited publication, the United Service, published at PhiladelEhia, there is an article by E. Henry laeombe which,-while it does not assume to support the Review's half-serious, halfhueaorous theory, does contain singular facts which seem to show tbat each marked improvement in destructive weapon 8 is the cause of a decreased loss of life in battle.... The writer has grouped into four periods the! more prominent battles of the last two hundred and fifty years, and has stated with ' all' the accuracy attainable, the average percentage of killed and wounded to the whole number engaged. He has made no effort at a selection of battles . favorable to the theory, and he has included only engagements in the- field. Sotbe pitched battles, such as Waterloo, have been omitted because accurate estimates of loss were sot accessible. "•■ The fir?t period extends from the time whei »c i*se of firearms became general to the introduction of the iron rasarod and the bayoaet. The battles inelnded in ttiil period are those of Leipsic, I*tzen, Continued in Fourth Bag*.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18800918.2.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3660, 18 September 1880, Page 1

Word count
Tapeke kupu
349

The Art of Destruction. Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3660, 18 September 1880, Page 1

The Art of Destruction. Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3660, 18 September 1880, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert