DISTRICT COURT.
THIS DAY.
(Before J. E. Macdonald, Esq., District • Judge.) ■ His Honor took his seat at 10 b'clofck. IN BANKRUPTCY. j BE JAMES TUCK. ■ \ Mrßrassey applied for the discharge of this debtor. Discharge granted. RE CHABIjEB W. HOVELL. Mr Brassey applied for the discharge of this bankrupt, who deposed that he bad given up all his property to meet the demands of his creditors. Granted.
H. T. BOWE V. HEBAMINA tE BAINGA. Claim, £64 16s 9d, amount of a promissory note. Defendant did not appear, as he was ill, but sent another native to represent him. ' H. T. Howe, sworn, deposed—He knew defendant. The signature on the note (produced) was that of defendant, who understood what he was doing when he signed it. It was interpreted to him. Judgment for plaintiff with costs, £5 11s. MCILHONE V. TINIPOAKA. Claim £50, amount of a promissory note.
H. Mcllhone deposed—He knew defendant. The note (produced) was signed by defendant, who thoroughly understood what he was about. He had not received any, payment in lieu of the note, though he had presented it to defendant; Judgment for plaintiff with costs £4 10s. Court adjourned.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18800907.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3650, 7 September 1880, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
192DISTRICT COURT. Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3650, 7 September 1880, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in