Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT

THIS DAY.

(Before H. Kenrick, Esq., R.M.) DRUNKENNESS.

Charles Golding was charged with the above offence, but as he had been locked up all night he was discharged.

CIVIL SIDE. JUPGMENTS FOB PLAINTIFFS.

Wilson v. Wga te Poroa. Claim, £5 10s, costs Bs.—H. T. Howe v. Honi Ngakapa, claim £5 ss, cost of a surrey,, and costs 13s.—A. Gillau v. Isaac Buck, claim, £12, board and lodging, costs 29s 6d.—H. T. Howe v. Hone Eopeha, claim £6 6s, cost of a survey, and costs.—W. Deeble v. Taylor, claim £7 8s 3d, and costs 11s.— Same v. Wheelan, claim £1 8s 6d, and costs Bs.

TAOGHAN V. BBOWN. Claim, £14

Defendant offered to pay in instalments of £2, to be paid fortnightly. His Worship made an order that defendant pay in fortnightly instalments of £2, or suffer one month's imprisonment.

Judgment Dbfebbed. g. n. bbassey v. ahi pepeni.

Claim, £19 Oa lOd, professional services. Mr Brassey proved the defendant owed him the money. His Worship deferred judgment till Monday morning. BENNETT V. "W. HETHBBINGTON. Claim, £9, groceries supplied. William Hetherington said he had given plaintiff some land scrip in lieu of the debt in 1876. When he gave him the scrip they were worth £30. He had not heard what Bennett had done with the scrip. He was not in a position to pay, as he was only receiving 35s a week, and had to keep a wife and four children. His Worship dismissed the case. Cases.

E. C. MOBGAN V. TAKEEEI.

Claim, £5 10s, goods supplied. Mr Miller for plaintiff. Eli Charles Morgan deposed that defendant had received the goods, but had Kiven him an order on Mr Mackay for the amount, which order had never been paid. His Worship gave judgment for plaintiff with costs £117s.

H. T. JIOWE V. KEPA. TE BAHUBT7HI.

Claim, £6 18s,'cost of the survey of a section of the Koromatua block at Ohinomuri.

. Mr Brassey appeared for the plaintiff. Kepa deposed—He waa the defendant, and owned part of the block referred to. He had not asked Mr Kowe to survey bis land, and Mr Howe had never asked him for the money. H. T. Eowe deposed—He surveyed the Koromatua block. It was afterwards divided into three sections. He had been paid for the other two sections. The third belonged to Kepa, who had promised to pay him the amount sued for. Kepa's name was not mentioned in the instructions.

His Worship nonsuited the plaintiff with costs, £1 6s.

MCILHONE V. EIKI PAKA.

Claim, £18, amount of a promissory note.

Mr Brassey for plaintiff and Mr Miller ":■: lefeodant.

K'ki Paka deposed—He knew plaintiff. He owed a man named Paul some money, but Mr Mcllhone had paid it for him, and he had given Mcllhone an order in settlement of Paul's debt.

After hearing some further evidence in this case, His Worship nonsuited the plaintiff with costs, £1 9s.

Adjouened Cases.

Wilson v. Wm. Hewitt; Mcllhone v. Hapi Eiwara ; Same v. Nikurimu Poutatara; Thomson v. Cogan.

ALLEY V. KELLY.

Cluim £10, damages, for trespass of cattle.

Mr Miller for defendant, and Mr Brassey for plaintiff. A large amount of evidence was ad* duced, but the case being heard at so late an hour precludes a report appearing in this issue.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18800903.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3647, 3 September 1880, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
547

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3647, 3 September 1880, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3647, 3 September 1880, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert