JOURNALISTIC NEGLIGENCE.
(To the Editor of the Evening Stab.)
Sir, —This morning on looking for a report of Sir George Grey's speech in the columns of your contemporary, I was highly indignant at not finding one word of it. The idea that a journal claiming to be the leading naoer (Impudent presumption .') and published not fifty miles away from where a member's speech was delivered, should not have a word of what the hon. member said, is md. jd terrible journalistic negligence. Nor is this the first time I have been disappointed, for neither did your contemporary have a word iv about ,R tader Wood's gv ech, no? of the English mail news, untu it was published in your valuable columns. The reason Sir George Grey's sorech is not published this mornitig may ac attributed to the fact that your contemporary holds doubtful opinions of Sir George. Hoping to see his speech in this evening's issue of the Stab.—l am, &c,
An Indignant Subscriber to thb Thames Advertises. Parawai, May 12,1880. 1
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18800512.2.14.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3550, 12 May 1880, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
172JOURNALISTIC NEGLIGENCE. Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3550, 12 May 1880, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in