Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WESTPOST.

Last night

Til the District Cow.-t, Steward; indicted for uui.awfa'ly wounding, pleaded not gui'ty; Mr Bickevlon Fisher, prisoner's cocnsel, moved to quash the indictment on the grounds that it was not signed by a Crowii Prosecutor legally appointed for that purpose. It appears that the District Court of Wellington was constituted by proclamation published in New Zealand Gazette of 15th July, 1875, and the same Gazette contains a notice dated 12th July that Government had then appointed Mr H. M. South as Crown Prosecutor for the District Courts. Mr v Fisher argued that the indictment must be signed by a Crown Prosecutor appointed to a consti tuted District Court, and that Mr Souths appointment, haying been dated on the 12th to a District Court which had no existence until the 15th July, was bad. It was further argued that Government letters patent bavred his exercise of: the prerogative of appointing officers to such as are necessary for the service of the colony, and that Souths appointment was unnecessary unless his office existed when his appointment was made.

Judge;: We'ston said if Mv Ei?her's contentions were sound the consequence would be that every indie)ment filed in that Court since its constitution was bail. Mr Fisher scid the Court had nothing to do with the consequences, aid pressed for judgment. • The Judge- refused ti>- quaili the indictment, but ..expressed gw;.fc doubts, end sifctnfied his wlTHngness to reserve the point, tad to fac;Khite subsequent proceedings. The difficulty so far as Steward's case was concerned was got over by the jury acquitting the prisoner. The judgment has caused great uneasiness, because if .Mr Fisher's objection, is good, the Judge's appointment, made at the same fc'me as Souths, is bad also, and eveiything, bofh civ:l and criminal, done in the District Couvts at Hokitika, l&rey-' mouth, Eeefion, aid Westport during the last five years is worthless.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18800224.2.8.5

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3484, 24 February 1880, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
312

WESTPOST. Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3484, 24 February 1880, Page 2

WESTPOST. Thames Star, Volume XI, Issue 3484, 24 February 1880, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert