AUCKLAND
This day. In the case Newman v. Machattie, the evidence for the plaintiff closed at 12.45. It was not shown that the election was characterised by any features which are not common to the majority of elections.
Defendant's solicitor will call no wit* nesses, being confident in winning his case upon legal points. Hunt is shown to have given no authority for the supply of refreshments, and to have refused to Tecognise any claim in connection therewith.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18791003.2.10.1.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3364, 3 October 1879, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
78AUCKLAND Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3364, 3 October 1879, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in