Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MEMORY.

Ralph Waldo Emerson delivered a lecture recently at Boston on the greatest of all the mental faculties. The lecturer bsgau by saying that memory was the leading faculty of the mind. It was tho principle of gravity which kept all other faculties cohesively together and prevented them flying off in the world of action. Man's memory was the cement, the matrix which contained the various particles of which his intelligence was composed. Its action was to collect and re-collect all the experiences of life. It seized hold of history wherever it was to be fonnd—in hooks, in observation, in conversation, in meditation, or elsewhere —and laid it away in the recesses of tho mind in mysterious fashion, becoming a storehouse of knowledge for preient and future use. This knowledge often lay dormant for years, bufc at the proper time asserted itself, if properly stored, in a mysterious way. Memory was the principal sgeat in settling the intellectual rank of men. Two people might start out on terms of mental equality. Both should read the same books, and living side by side have the same advantages of experience. But one re*d and observed differently, from the other. The ono fixed what ho saw and heard in his mind ; the other allowed it to slip from him. The minds of th» two men then resembled the difference between a well and a poorly constructed tool. For example, a finely made watch, or a sharp and perfectly tempered knifeblade represented one mind, while the other was a clumsily manufactured article. It was said of Humbolt that he remembered every book he ever read, and everything he ever saw, in perfection. This was the case with most of the great men of history. Nearly all of tho world's most remarkable orators, poets, statesmen, wits, soldiers, philosophers, scientists, <fee, were men of tenacious memory. Quintillian had said that memory was genius. While this was true in the man it did not always follow that men of genius possessed it. Isaac Newton was a remarkable exception. He could not remember oftentimes his own great works without trouble; and Newton's geniut was undoubted. Themistocles on the other hand remembered everything. On one occasion an admirer 'asked the great Athenian how he could remember everything. " I would rather teach you how to forget everything," was the reply. But this waa wit and not reason, said the lecturer. It had been said that the affectations or feelings were the greatest incentives to memory. The senses or passions lead men to remember. Napoleon cared nothing for Alexandrine verse; but^iot one line of his army returns was ever absent from his mind. Scipio knew nearly every man by face snd name in his army; Seneca could repeat 2000 words of a poem only once heard; Mittendates ; who commanded an army made up of all the nations of the globe, could converse in all their representative languages. The Prince of Orange on one occasion saw Grotius standing by out of curiosity during the roll call of one of his regiments. Having heard much of Orotius' memory, he asked him if he could remember the names which had been read. Grotius astounded the Prince by giving all the names in inverse order. A great scholar had once been deprived by an enemy of a much-loved book. His enemy thought he had conquered him but the scholar re-wrote the book from memory and defied his enemy. As a further illustration of the memory being strong when the feelings are enlisted, the lecturer said a man never forgets a debt due himself, nor, as Dr. Johnson says, who kicked him last. The late John Brown, of Ossawatomie and Harper's Ferry fame, was fond of sheep farming, and had at one time 3000 sheep, each one of which be eonld single out from any other flock into which it might have strayed. In his own town of Concord, his neighbor, Mr Abel Norton, who dealt in horses and was very fond of them, could remember at a glanca any one of the hundreds of animals that he had ever seen. Horses which had been sent years ago to Various parts of Massachusetts by Mr Norton sometimes came back Co Concord, and were at once recognised by him as they were driven along the street.

Wanted

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18790922.2.15

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3354, 22 September 1879, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
720

MEMORY. Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3354, 22 September 1879, Page 3

MEMORY. Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3354, 22 September 1879, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert