MR ROWE'S CONDUCT AND CAREER CRITICISED.

Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3311, 1 August 1879, Page 2

MR ROWE'S CONDUCT AND CAREER CRITICISED.

(To the Jidito^ of tbe^EvEH^^STAB.) Sir,—l see' that our* other member, least one fjciend^l&ho, ventured to take up the cudgels "on * his'benau; ■ I refer to Junius, whose production Appeared Jii r:the jSlftrf^bp qthejr day.j % $jfik, however, that'he*-isf nearly alone o^ftpe Thames in,^ tbflt 7T re» s ReQL for to every \yortHf>ReHtintheßo«Mn)fi4»pt«altatires of New Zealand, and I don't think I dould put itistroiijter fcf.tlwr^Wkjal' the* universe in that respect, I believe at one period?or-'aubtl»er ! 'lias;r e fg*iflfataAa«lli Wellington, N«w?«uf4sealand. Junias mildly insinuates that-Mr Howe has been ■;;cbna£hMU/: B i^TJIMTI9' €W& .. In J^ROJLUIgJ!"? poijcy of thejjest friend the poor man of New' ZeaTMffWeTßawT~*3lr Kowe has been ■poosiftaotiin obeying the orders of the^faWcTsh&rn^of the Middle Island, and following in the wake of the I see that Mr Bowe, in palliation of hii conduct inpfcl^flfte) div^ipu on the noconfidence motion, states that he wil elected on the ...Opposition ticket. In answer to that I would only refer to a Tpjilll^inreßtingriqilfedi^ ghedQataatf of Wm. Bowe s Committee at the period of that genj^Sirisj^ajd^flwj, when he stated that he was in favor of the Abolition Bill; but MxJLowe took particalar care to inform the elector! of the Thames Grey's views, and that I Joelif'f was the real ticket on which William Bowe ,114 ft !B»¥cte4 ffljipi |tofiejffCoii|jnMfed his consistent Yme of conduct immediately after taking,M«<A!i&Mfei*«hen the Piako land sale was brought before the House hwo^Acmßed!,^,a« »i ta!ripdJe WSO |Q a^Hlll opinion i think the majority of electors heri> coincidoJ ■ Thadeb«U:w«s M^tf«r«fll in the interval; the gentleman most ''iriteftsted iiif>the^irindle''ari>i»edyr«id«to the adjourned debate Mr Kowe recollected that he had sailed"6t»f;fbe«irtfltJ»efwWle of the land in a boat. I wonder who broulHf'¥aft." Mia on the second occasion. Mr Bowe thought, of course, that it was a very prudent aePto give the firm of Whitaker. and.Jiu*wH about one hundred thousand acres of land for'about n&tb^Bg*pe£ aHre. Thafe'lfe numerou?r:-i|W^pcjßj|. ? o^>M!jr( t Eowe's Otnsistenoy ttkat .may be brought, to mind when 'Mr 1 B^wr_gjiJesvJariTadßouot of his. stewardship, in conclusion I ■ Junii& .rkrtfWfOfm* friendfof^nf Juembeifrlh?^gjfti|r can inform me on jwhat^ocqasion Mr Bowe 1»»..n0t. ot Mfe?!*y. b!rlj^-aiW' On his nrst KjV ac|^ by-the-by, g n^M y appearance bef^reV the electors D jn gf lM Thames, he wass met with an unnus^ltaHe vote of .want of« confidence, in spttf^^e Jsck.invthe-boS who d»»hpnor«4it^,jab«ir Jooc fthat i'oc.dasion^ who iCMds^gr taj^rlfe means in his'ipdirei to npset the «Kjpr#«f|d opinion 1 of that meetingiu- ,'lf .'Ulrrißirtre wa# olectea toi oppose jtMtt^ptof*!lfrey* surely no fault cai^be found with his con* -<dpefoi,X kiffi^i^eie^ V'^ftfllf^ie* hearty reception tnat nis consistenty • • G^ahamstowny-Ut Augaat, .18Z&_.^,