MR BRIGHT ON PROTECTION.

Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3191, 12 May 1879, Page 4

MR BRIGHT ON PROTECTION.

The following letter from Mr John Bright, M. P., has been received by Mr Cyrus A. Field, of New York :— " One Ash, Rochdale, "January 21st, 1879.

VMy dear Mr Field,-r-I never write for reviews or any other "periodicals. It is so long since I have written that my hand has lost its canning—»if it ever had it. Ido not think anything an Englishman could say would have any effect upon an American' protectionist. The in an who possesses a monopoly by which he thinks he gains is not open to atpument. It was so in this country forty years ago, and it is so with you now. ~lt is strange that a people who put down slavery at an immense sacrifice are riot able to suppress monopoly, which is bat a milder form of the same evil. Under slavery 1 the man was seized and hii labor was stolen from him, and the profit of it employed by his master and owner. Under protection the man is apparently free, but lie is denied the right to exchange the produce of his labor except with his countrymen, who offer him much less for it than the foreigner would give. Some portion of his labor is thus confiscated. In our protection days oar weaver! and artisans could not exchange with American flour. They exchanged with an English farmer, who gave them sometimes only half the quantity the American would have given them. Now your farmer is forbidden to trade with the Englishman, and must give to an American double the quantity of grain and flour for many articles he is constantly requiring that he would give if your laws' did not forbid his trade with England. A country may have democratic institutions; its Government may be Republican and based on a wide suffrage, and yet there may be no freedom to men for that which is the source of life and comfort. If a man's labor is not free; if its exchange is not free, the man is not free; and whether the law which enacts this restriction be the offspring of Republican or autocratic Government and power, it is equally evil and to be condemned and withstood by all who love freedom and understand what it is. Nations learn slowly—but they do learn, and therefore I do not doubt that the time will come when trade will jje as free as the winds, and when freedom of industry will do much to cut down great armies and the peril and suffering of war. But lam writing you almost an article instead of a short note—as if I would teach you^ which would be an impertinence. If you could teach your farmers, and ask ' the solid South' to help you, you might soon succeed. " Believe me, " Always sincerely your frieud, ".loun Bbight."