INDIAN HOME LIFE.
A lecLure was delivered on the 10th February at the London Institution by Professor Monier Williams, the subjsct being " Indian Home Life." He stated that Indian home life was closely connected with Indian caste life. In India caste was a religion as well as a social institution. Men *were believed to be created by God, in distinct classes, with distinct occupations. Horn a wearer, a man must remain a weaver, and .his. jons and grandsons must remain weavers too. Externally the structure of a typical Indian hou3e resembles that of the houses of Pompeii. 'Every rcspeclabl* house had a room called " Gcd's room," where domestic worship was performed daily. The women's apartments were at the back or at the top.. ]No. r ooe entered there but the immediafe members of the family and the priests. In old houses there was' a room called "the
room of "anger." ' When- 'any' member of the householdr was offended, jUe,r;<BUut himself up there .till his grievance was redressed.", An "Indian; ; family,r djdj^not merely coniist of., husband, wife, "and children, Sometimes ; 100. persona^,u*s eluding four generations, from great grandfather to great grandchildren, might be found''iivingt in i>ne?;«fcode. Anarchy was prerented hj Ye«*iiij Eupretueautbority in the oldeit."Ofsett an old grandmother .rejgaed iupreme, keeping order with wonderful tact. Th« women superintended the cooking and wiitedjbn their,hußbands^advbrotheiiTat dinner, eating their leavings afterwards. Hindu wive8 r) were ,- remarkable for shrewdness, 1 thrift,' "and' 'devotion to their families. Yet a wife was little' valued, except as'a~ mother. The most .important, event T in jthe (r family, jjju ihe bTrth of a son.' The tiapp iriess'of d'ecMlea parents in ,theotherworlddepended upon the constant* performance 'of'"obsequial ceremonies by sons.. The nezt most important events were the initiation of sons the sacred thread, an*d~ their mwrjiage. As to marriage, it was effected by at intervals—(l) betrothal 'at 1 five 4 years of age; (2) the r regular, marriage cere* mony at nin'eor ten, when the boy-bus-,>and jr^r^dj^oui. his feri^to^ fathers house; rf (3) the 4' concluding took his bride home. Many Hindu boyi wore father! at sixteen.; i&mlx &mm 9 was the curse of India. There was not a household withoutn child 'widoifi».t9fißv were condemned to a life of misery. Yet Indian-home ilife-ihadVinuch in it to call forth our admiration. A vast chasm separated the social condition of eastftln .and western countries. English jnajjjiji* tions could not be transplanted to an Indian;ioil until-it was prepared theij reception. , r . .^e^ m.^st gradually elevaje the miljioris"committed to^tfar rule, but m doing so^ w^'ma'st nbt erpeet td denationalise Indian home Hfe.~
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18790506.2.19
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3186, 6 May 1879, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
428INDIAN HOME LIFE. Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3186, 6 May 1879, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.