RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT
... THIS DAY. (Before Colonel Fraser, R.M.) Judgments Fora Piaintiffs.
In the following eases judgment was given for the plaintiff and costs: —Hayman T. Ransfield.—Claim, £12 lls, board and lodgings, and costs £2 lla. Townsend v. H. H. Tizard.—Claim, £6 14s. goods, and costs £2 lls. Hewin and Bros. v. J. Pollock.—Claim, £4 9s 6d, balance of account, and costs 16s. K. Bull r. Martin.—Claim, £7 16s 6d, balance of account, and costs 18s. Mears and Co. v. Miln.—Claim, £2 8s 6d. goods, and costs 15s. Endrei v. Ransfield. — Claim, £7 13s sd, goods, and costs £2. Judgment Summonses. macdonald and Icilleb v. j. mcoob« .'.'.' ";.. , micb;. . ' ... ' Claim, £9 ss. { . ;; James McCormick, sworn, deposed—l ami the person that plaintiffs obtained a judgment against some time ago. I have not paid anything. I have been out of work a fortnight. I was in the employ of -th» County-Council. I have no other pressing debts at present. I cannot promise.to'pay anything. Since my bankruptcy I have paid off several debts of •honor.- "''' '' "J '" '"■' " -:; ' ' •■■;'. '• Ordered to pay 12s per month. '.'."' SAME V. JOHN GBAHAM. • ,^lf^tAm,£4iM .■■;■, ■.-, i, :.. y -■:: ;.■-,: t> "John Graham, sworn, deposed—l am the person against whom plaintiffs obtained a judgment some time ago. I paid £1 into Coort.in accordance with an agree* ment with Mr Miller, by which I was to pay £l per month. I was going to pay the ijther £1 when I received a letter from Sir Miller threatening to sue, so I paid the money to another creditor. Ordered to pay £1 per month. BABTT V. BLAIB. Claim, £3 Os 9d. A telegram had been received from defendant offering 5s per week. Ordered' to pay 5s per week. Defended Cases, loddbb v. hat. Claim, £10, damages for breach of eon- ' -MflJraßsey-for plaintiff, »nd Mr-Miller for defendant. Richard May, iworn, deposed—l am the'defendant. I recollect letting a fisbiag^boat to Lodder on the 21st, and >he took, possession on the 25th. Before letting it I had it repaired. It is a flatbottomed dingy worth £3 10s. I don't recollect speaking to Wilson,' asking him to hire me a boat to give to Lodder, as I had taken mine from him and feared to get into a mess about it. I lent Lodder • the boat for only one • week. I re-took possession of the boat on April Ist. Lodder had the boat for one week and a day. Mr Dodd paid me 3s on Lodder's account for the week and a day. I did not say I could take my own property when 1 liked. William Lodder, sworn, gave his version of the agreement, which was that he had the boat at a weekly rental of 2s 6d, and May, was to give him a week's notice when he; required the boat to go up the Piako. The agreement was made in the goods shed at Shortland wharf. Through the taking of the boat he had lost a net, having left it at Kopu. ' William Parker, sworn, gave corroborative evidence. He heard May asking "Wilson.to hire a boat to give to Lodder, as he knew there would be trouble over his taking away a boat from Lodder. Alfred Gubb and Henry Elvin, sworn, also gave corroborative evidence. Richard May, re-examined—l made the agreement with Lodder to let him have the boat for one week for 2s 6d. I only let him•,have it for charity. It is not necessary to give a week's notice when a boat it hired, unless particularly specified. . Thomas Arnold gave evidence concerning the usage respecting the letting, of boats. ' " ,-;,,.... .. - •'. '.;'.■'..;.; '.1 , Judgment for plaintiff £210s, and.costs £3ios. .. _ ;"■; . , . : B. k'DONNELL V. BEATTIE. Claim, £5, balance of accouat. gjMi-Dodd for defendant. Edward McDonnell, sworn, deposed—l am a produce merchant, and supplied goods ;to defendant, amounting to £9 8s 3d, and have received two sums, viz., £2 8s 3d, and £2 on account, leaving a balance of £5 due. Jo By Mr Dodd—Two items were left out of the accounts at Mrs Beattie's request. Elizabeth Beattie, sworn, deposed—l never asked Mr McDonnell to keep two ; items put of the account. I never got any wheat. , '„ Cisc adjourned till next Court day for jpirpduo^bn of further evidence. The Maiden's .Band of Hope.—A husband. !';:;;'. '
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18790418.2.19
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3171, 18 April 1879, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
702RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3171, 18 April 1879, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.