Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE Evening Star. PUBLISHED DAILY AT FOUR O'CLOCK P.M. Resurrexi. FRIDAY, MARCH 14, 1879.

The decision given by the Resident Magistrate this morning in the case Flemiug v. L. Ehrenfried is not only of great local importance, "but also of colonial importance, should it be upheld by a higher tribunal. The facts of the case in brief are these:—Mr Ehrenfried was rated for certain property in Brown, street, which he asserts be is neither owner nor occnpier of, nor was at the time of the raluation. He appealed to the Assessment Court on these grounds, but the Taluation was confirmed, and as a matter of course he was rated for the property. When the rate came due Mr Ehrenfried declined to pay it, and acting, no doubt, under legal advice, defended the action

when sued by the Borough for the reovery of the rate. Today, Major Keddell gave judgment for the defendant. The Eating Act, 1876, section 44, says :— " The rate-book so signed/(by three members of the local body), with corrections, if any, shall, unless the conttary be proved, be evidence in all courts of the contents thereof, and that the same has been made according to the provisions of this Act." The reading of this clause may at first sight appear to uphold the claim of the Borough,, but the italicised words appear to have a deeper meaning than they at first may seem to have. Major Keddell evidently held that " the contrary " had been proved. We are, however, unable to digest the 34th clause, which enacts that the decision of the Assessment Court shall be final, and " no proceedings shall be removed into any superior Court by certiorari or otherwise. 1' It is to be regretted that the amount sued for is too small a sum to permit of an appeal against the judgment being made to the Supreme Court.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18790314.2.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3142, 14 March 1879, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
312

THE Evening Star. PUBLISHED DAILY AT FOUR O'CLOCK P.M. Resurrexi. FRIDAY, MARCH 14, 1879. Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3142, 14 March 1879, Page 2

THE Evening Star. PUBLISHED DAILY AT FOUR O'CLOCK P.M. Resurrexi. FRIDAY, MARCH 14, 1879. Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3142, 14 March 1879, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert