Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

It will be remembered that Mr J. 0. Firth, at the meetings of the Chamber of Commerce in Auckland lately, has taken some interest in the U.P.A. business, and communicated with the local bodies as to what could be done. At one of the last meetings he said that no answers had been received to his communicationi, which was scant encouragement to the Chamber to interfere in a matter with which they had no direct concern. Such a statement led people to infer that the local bodies here had been so discourteous as to disregard the communications of the Chairman Chamber Commerce, and the County Council, not wishing to have such an imputation fixed upon them, at once wrote to Mr Firth, and invited his attention to the replies they had sent. Mr Firth now makes the following explanation in yesterday's Herald: — " Sir, —In my remarks at the Chamber of Commerce on the stoppage of the Thames pumping operations, relative to the fact that no notice had been tiken of the committee's request by any of the parties concerned, I find that I inadvertently omitted to except the Thames County Council, the Chairman of that body having courteously sent the following telegrams, which were inadvertently regarded as replies to prior telegrams:— • Many thanks for kind t-legrams. Just leaving for Ohmemuri. Will reply on return.'—'Eegret financial position precludes Council from contributing toward maintenance of pump after end of month.' Pray insert this amende.' " We may now remind Mr Firth that of two telegrams Bent by him to the Borough one was answered at length by the Mayor, and the answer was actually read by himself at a meeting of the Chamber, as shown by reports in the Auckland papers. That telegram was a sort of ultimatum. If Mr Firth can have lost all recolleotioa of these answers through " inadvertence," he will be the better able to excuse the single inadvertence of the Borough Council in neglecting to send a reply to his necond telegram, as the answer must hare been of a similar tenour to that previously sent.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18790214.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3118, 14 February 1879, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
347

Untitled Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3118, 14 February 1879, Page 2

Untitled Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3118, 14 February 1879, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert