CIVIL SIDE.

Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3100, 24 January 1879, Page 2

CIVIL SIDE.

Judgments for PuwtiMs. la the following cases judgment, wai given for plaintiffs :—Onne ?. Mb^*? «~ Claim, £2145, goods, and costs lit,' j& Casey t. same—Claim; £1, goodq, and costs 11s. VJfhitehead r.' K. Maginn— Claim, £3 9s, goods, and costa JUs. S. Dickey v. Tookey Tribute CcMnJany— Claim, £17 3s 6d, work and labor, and costs £2 9s. Casey ?. same—Claim, £19 2s' 3d, timber, and costs ,£2 9s. John Bead v. J. Wilson—Chum, £355, balanoe doe on promissory. note, andcpiiti lla.

v;':' ■■■-:■■' DbFBNDBD OliM. •?'> DB. KILOOUB T. U Ii qOTITT, Claim, £116s sd, rent. Mr Miller for plaintiff r ftfo cDodd for defendant., / ' - . Charle» F. Quuit, iworn, depoied—l know the premises in Willpugkby.itreet called the Reduction Works, And also an allotment in Mackay street adjoining the Reduction Works. There r was;* watte tailings deposited on the Mabka*! atreet allotment. I had an interest 1 inf the allotment in Willoughby street up to; 72. I was a sleeping partner; 1= htd 1^ no in. tercst since 72'in'ihy~bwii'Byttle t;^ l'''>r By Mr.Miiler~l had an interest in Kaithby and MuirV name. About two years ago I agreed tb sell the premises to Adams and Andrews, thinkings that I had an interest in it. I hare not got a mortgage marked 3Q60d.; •i, >; ;•■,„''■■: J Jrmes Armitrongi IliUe^iiMoiii deposed—l know defendant In Mirch, 72, I was acting as solicitor for the lessors with reference to thft transfer of the property injuestion toSpjikby, jffuir and Quint. (Witness here read the draft lease.) Shortly after the of the {^"^"^Vto^ « imor*ga«i*fc! jitlfrom Eaithby,and'Mtitri." --^wijaSvo^. r-| 1 JaittieV fiilgonrj^oiMf deW)B«d-I am the plaintiff. The defendant owes me fire quarters' rent for the two allotment!

known as the Eeduotion Works. That rent is still due. The document produced is my title to the property. It mentions the property being underlease to Eaitbby, Muir and Quint, who hare hitherto paid the rent. C. F. Quint, recalled, deposed —I gate a notice to quit the allotment in Mackay street in '77, because I could not give Adams a title to the property, I gave notice to Mr Heron. I hate always paid rent in the name Raithby and Mnir. I hare never had anything to do with the property since '77. Henry Hopper Adams, sworn, deposed —I remember having a transaction with Mr Quint about two years ago, in respect to this property. My partner and I did not take over the premises though we agreed to do so. We only got the machinery, and Quint agreed to take the allotments back. James Kilgour, recalled, deposed—Quint asked me to reside on the Mackay street' allotment and gave me a fresh ,lease... • -:,.■•■■■■.., „;■■.• f ' Judgment for £11 6s 6d, and costs £3 . .<!&*. :'ii-T- :. ■ : -■■:■:.■ . " ■ .'. ' '■ , :; ! THOMPSON V. DlXi , Claim, £8 7s, board and lodging. Mr Dodd.for plaintiff, and Mr Miller for defendant. - Defeadi|(^ admitted all the items; but said that lie had not been credited for £1 ■125.-"- ••-:- '•- .-•■■'•■ ■■;■■■ •■• James Thompson, plaintiff, deposed— That the bill of particulars was correct. He had given defendant credit for all the payments made on account. ! ' ■ ; Hemry Djx, deposed—He had paid Thompson all the debt except £6 15s. Judgment for £8 7s, and costs £116 i. Court iiajojifnedi