Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE HAND AND EVOLUTION.

Recently Professor Huxley delivered an inaugural address to the South London Working Men's College on the above subject. The haud, he said, was the most important part of a man's anatomy, not even, perhaps, excepting the brain ; for, without the hand, emanations of the brain could not be, in most cases, put in force. It performed many wonderful functions, such as touch and communicating one with another, &c and all by the means of a very simple machinery. He then proceeded to explain how the digits were moved by muscles and tendons, and drew especial attention to the wonderful movements, use, and power of the thumb. In order to see what the hand was capable of doing, a person should watch an expert player on the violin. There was no source of power yet discovered, he maintained, so economical as that supplied by the human machine. He denied, however, that the hand, or any part, or whole of the human body was the result of design in the same sense as might be applied to the completion of a watch or a steamengine. It was owing to evolution and chSlge. The Professor then sketched out on the blackboard the various forms through which the infant passed up to the time of its birth, to show the truth of his hypothesis, and proceeded to say that the term "made," when used in reference to the human subject, in the same way as it would be applied to the manufacture of a timepiece, was an erroneous expression. The human body, and, in fact that of all animals, was evolved —that was, it was constantly changing from the time of its conception. We were all, in fact, in the position of Topsy, "we growed," but how we grew it was impossible to state. One thing was certain, and that was the dootrine of evolution ; became it was clearly demonstrable. (Cheers.) Some people thought that if the theory of evolution was onca recognised by the masses, that we should be picking one anotherg pockets, and cutting each other's throats, but he felt confident that such would not be the case, nor would they who were in the room, after hearing his remarks, be more inclined to lend their hands to picking and stealing tham before they had listened to him. (Cheers.) The proceedings terminated with a hearty Tote of thanks.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18790114.2.15

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3091, 14 January 1879, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
400

THE HAND AND EVOLUTION. Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3091, 14 January 1879, Page 3

THE HAND AND EVOLUTION. Thames Star, Volume X, Issue 3091, 14 January 1879, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert