WARDEN'S COURT.
THIS DAY.
(Before W. Eraser, Esq;y Warden.)
GOLDSMITH V. LOGAW. This was as'plaint.--brought by the Mining Inspector for' non-payment of rent on residence site—£3 being due. Defendant denied the debt. .
} J.iMi!McLaren} Goldfields proved the position of the site to be within theGoldfield. --I 1 • '
Henry Goldsmith, Mining Inspector, sworn, deposed—The site was firßt taken by a man named- Martin in 72, and had been twice;transferred. It was now in defendant's.name, though it was occupied by a man named,Abbott. ■ Albert J. Allom, Receiver of Goldfields Bevenue, sworn, deposed—There is three years' rent due on the site in question; and it has been in defendant's name since the rent has been.accruing. : ? , - Tbej defendant said that he had not had possession' ■■ 'of',, the property; -. for years; thßu'ghv^e/ had ndt surrendered it. * Ano* ther person, was now living in it. Judgment for plaintiff £3, and costs,
Court adjourned.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18780830.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume VIII, Issue 2977, 30 August 1878, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
146WARDEN'S COURT. Thames Star, Volume VIII, Issue 2977, 30 August 1878, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in