ASSESSMENT COURT.

Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2542, 28 February 1877, Page 2

ASSESSMENT COURT.

THE COUNTY.

scnobi'-rbonf tq ' n hea>'-"pbje'ctioflf,' to the i County AffikMMW*"* wS * ftla : i »iM;irfrßrM«cdonHld™Baid4b«t-<f«llttdiog| to the 28th section of the Bating Act) he] <was 'prepared^to lidmit; thatthfo' Go^DjEy i list.had not been>preparediby the datjaie.-; quired by the Act, but it was finished ati the present timeV'and he would ask the Judge of the Assessment Court in dispharge of his powers aa Judge, to ap-

point Mr H. Vernon Valuator under the section quoted. Tho Judge having called the County Clerk, . and being informed that the list not beeij. fflffideCb^ the time required, a^&inteA.•■Mr^e^BSfc^valuator, aud fixed tUjfJ Cour| .ibt^eft^objeCtions to be holdon >aiv^he WJirt|eifo flp'ttrt, Thames, on April f2^i|i. TMiist <l|]be finished by March ! I||| ai|d lj)||t|at||| office of the County Qj|uncri |!w^aibj||ff for inspection until , A;pril 4&h% : -..££sf t ( ""Mr" Maedoiiard stated the costs already incurred by Mr Vernon had amounted ii £190, leaving for the valuator only tho Kdift'erencei4jetaw©^tfea*OTffi^^^ The Judge said as long as the Council was satisfied he was, provided the sum _paid to the valuator wa§ iustand reasojiable, and fixed the cost or making the valuation listsajfciiSMO.fts^.;-;?«?;!!

EtTTiEKAKSA. " ;- The objections, made <• by owners <©§- then heard. W. C^ell7ho! udeTiff"gaMeSrßtreet, valued at £10 ; value excessive. Objector statedLJie^wou^d jdadj* lei,i4 fof 2a^& week.Cs Ek fob lo&jeMfed WaßtaJUin Edward street being.vjl.ued at £13, saying In answer to the -Judge objector said he^ofilj^ues p^e .irppe^j $*$&$%& the other at £9. :,_ ! Mr Mitchell coßsider£<rthafc the houses ;\T,ere weli worth tEe amount At which ttfey Were'as&ssed. v v' l A A \^ i la answer to the Judge Mr Ternon' jsaid he cohs|dered Til:ne valuation made, iwas a fajfeoae.^, e sp? ejpl^kipd that this year fre^ft .v^lWti4ns*hlrtPbilmmad&while in previous years they had instructions not to raise thPvafuati&n.W^'? > Mr McCormick said he considered the jform'&WuSfl&Mi -%l^M VfrfftiPM two properties a fair one. jObjecto* said neliad objected beFore, and !ffeft F#lM^li b|efc^ted )( ,b^t ftfsjfiaj,} ■had been raised £2. There were only |2 rooms. tfm^mP^timh he thought ithat £15 or £16 was plenty For ifc. i '){B«i»cedf[tO)-£X^»q?.:! I f/nijrwl s!>:ol irH { - Ai«oo»jibiial|©tm©at&iafe,!l92,fiiaadiQ j AugustosSfslcegf, ,mo % i «all&~J|fcce»sive. ;Objector ?hiifc mm®&Wltffy'ms 6d per jyear, and then l.&MftfrtAd now was raised ito-£i~per yea* in-raies— Mr Mitchell said he was willing the rsS#}l#i]a be r^ffifLioMlK'lQillfO \ Mr Vernon said he conaweredT £i 5 a ffair price. B&ttWNrt&R 0 ! Eugene Hale, two_houses in Holleston, ! street, £20, val«£fes;ce3«Lve ! Theie was^io^f&urfcpee&f objector. j Valuation cfcfi&rnSedi^ \ '^V * I £» HmL altytmiM&ttf' hoi.*s& m Edjwafl s.^re.efe.,#-,*sQ.^4^b«)li£^c al|©:m<Jßfc occupied, andLf^viui^Jxeesßiv&s ; Jj^ Mitchell eonsfHiered mp~ yatuatjdn i a fair tyie, and M^' Teniotf/^«W>r^[d ! hiSi-api&Kin. 1 . - ■/"^^■h',' i Dr Henderson/alU^^^M I;^)*^house in {Edward strec|;'"3Bi^|a^^woe*3sive. j Mr Mitcheri^aM^Krj^B^ght some reI duction might be*~mao!e", and Mr Vernon ! thouirJijr^iS t-a i&w tr«lite. ileduceds-to ; J. Heron objecrea to an allotment in the dWne'r. 'OBjlSlbTp Beihg' s%o¥tf said ! the house if it wo^d give them (JJr^ iKilgour and himself) a vote atth^Cpunli ''election, but finding ifb^6uld;-tfo rt |ofi i arrangement rTame| strucK o.uJ/«wT W'-Pj*-Hoi'oft"Bls(> jiskeii^to appefir for •l)r. fclgouf,rWt v Hipf application-was not i gr»irtediMS./|. : J. Jenkins prapsiiy in Augustus street/ £p, xalitp jKfWpf A /ftbjejtor said W"' tffouilcff- dßra'^wHa vbe * iMair charge*^ jßeduced To^E18», r , r .„, '^^oll^oS^M^wMalfel&lU MA one iu^i^ft^ijpadj ;^&ls (fWQ^^. value. %«piA#ir> alution confirmed.

£40»-,W4J§*AXce.ssiye. Obiectbrsaid he ir!lWlKlfWwlulKlfe¥l to £20. He had 6 allotments.

£92 J. Newsop, property-in Eolleston street, £20, exces^iy^iTiglue. Vi ,Sf ' Messrs Mitchell aria Veraon considered fm?ym«bz#ai?s^e.c}^4! mmif '^Ol^ridW^a^d tarWeSferi?. 41™ C /5: House in Sandes street redugea B tgj^BSf the other rate to stand. »~sg $|ftte&) ?l<®se,. i §id k ajil l D^fngn.^in :^dA wards street, value. Ordered to stand*-.«-!! • \MfiiSouter,! Eiuaelaqgari^ripJjJi'QSphQ^ £52, excessive.Vfflue.gTf^'.q

Reduced to £35. Jt^^i^h^Dms.'^wowalld^Heijtsj^fflfr^ street, £^;*'fAifefelcceiSl^. w (!"a Eeduced to £5. E. ToomeylWoYinentr'and property in FMnklin,»te^l£6,sSiiilMifex2eislve; also allotments and housesjn Augustus street, £87* owner oFone only. " * ' The secoud order^,^. to be strucic ouci6^ £7, value excessivja. .„ ConfirniejJ n 0,,-' T " .-.^ n ry^ t .>^ J^ v tfdf^eJ'libiis^ Tri. EimDel't itreet, Bb'lyA'&G eicessivi.; '• :.- :!^ V; '':: :T f" . "■'ife-dji'^'tb^idsV ''■■■'-.■"•• ;p'; s;? :m g'ollfi^ii' street,,££o, value .exceslirk^^ .VKe/iucea.to #i6>.' . ... :^- \ j., j-u&j ,■,•^6 ,C6urt-|then closed. ;; '<;•-;, mirjff